This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: services from another person. Chodos states that, it should be value of his specific time and service, specifically the amount he could have earned in legal fees as a practitioner over the two years he devoted to writing his manuscript. But courts didnt buy it. The jury took a reasonable value of Chodoss services based on extensive testimony presented, on what another practicing attorney wouldve done the work for. Holding: The value of restitution reward is based off of the market rate. Synthesis: Dissent/Concurrences:...
View Full Document
- Fall '11