This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: Rule: Negligence is on a reasonable person standard, they have a duty to not create more risk to the naturally risk of things. Rational: This court is of appeals, to reverse whether there could be a summary judgment. Held that 1) they did impose more risk because, they knew it was a congested lake, they imposed a strict time limit, and only gave one weighing station. Also GCBB did owe a duty to the jet ski person, even if they were not participating in the event, or even speculating the event. They however, shared the same waterway, similar to cars sharing the same road. Holding: The court remanded the case, stating that there was enough evidence to prove that GCBB could be negligence and they did owe a duty to the decedent Synthesis: Dissent/Concurrences:...
View Full Document
- Fall '11