This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: in their territorty. Also, International shoes only applies to the absents of a person in a territory. There is one thing to note: He came to California voluntarily. Had it been through duress or forced, then it would have been different. It is a totality of the circumstances test. Holding: Tag jurisdiction statute adopted by a state is constitutional, consistent with due process. Synthesis: Dissent/Concurrences: Justice White concurring in part. And in judgment. Stating that, it’s so traditional, and unless it completely in all ways grossly violates due process, it’ll still stand. Justice Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, and O’Connor concurs in judgment. They actually evaluate the comment under a due process notion. By going to a state, the defendant avails himself of significant benefits provided by the State. Justice Stevens concur. He agrees w/ parts of everyone....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 12/20/2011 for the course CIV PRO 141 taught by Professor Daucher during the Fall '11 term at Western State Colorado University .
- Fall '11