Unformatted text preview: Rational: The USSC stated that the writer and editor’s intentional and allegedly tortuous actions were expressly aimed at California. They knew that it would have a potentially devastating impact upon respondent, and that the injury would be felt in the state where the respondent lived in. They must have “reasonably anticipated being haled into court there” to answer for the truth of the statement made in their article. Holding: California had personal Jurisdiction for all parties Synthesis: Dissent/Concurrences:...
View Full Document
- Fall '11
- John Edwards, Personal jurisdiction, National Enquirer