National Dv. Co. v. Triad Holding Corp.

National Dv. Co. v. Triad Holding Corp. - Issue: Whether...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
National Dev. Co. v. Triad Holding Corp. 930 F.2d 253 (1991) Fact: Operative Facts: The plaintiff was serving papers to Adnan Khashoggi. Adnan has many homes, but he claims his primary home is in Saudi Arabia. The plaintiff handed the summons and complaint to a housekeeper at Khashoggi’s condo apartment in New York. The housekeeper testified that Khashoggi was in NY and was staying in the apartment at the time for a total of 34 days. (the apartment/condo was a 20-25 million dollar condo).
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Issue: Whether you can be served in a home that isnt your primary residence. Rule: Defendant maybe served at a usual place of abode at which the process may be left. Rational: As long as you live there, you can be served there, assuming youre around. Holding: A second, or vacation home, is considered an abode if they live there for a reasonable amount of time. It does not have to be the primary residence. Synthesis: Dissent/Concurrences:...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/20/2011 for the course CIV PRO 141 taught by Professor Daucher during the Fall '11 term at Western State Colorado University .

Ask a homework question - tutors are online