This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: 106
3.59 Let k be a ﬁeld, let f (x ) ∈ k [x ] be nonzero, and let a1 , a2 , . . . , at be some
distinct roots of f (x ) in k . Prove that
f (x ) = (x − a1 )(x − a2 ) · · · (x − at )g (x )
for some g (x ) ∈ k [x ].
Solution. Absent.
3.60 If R is a domain and f (x ) ∈ R [x ] has degree n , show that f (x ) has at most
n roots in R .
Solution. Let F = Frac( R ); if f (x ) had more than n roots in R , then
it would have more than n roots in F (which contains R ), and this is a
contradiction.
3.61 Let R be an arbitrary commutative ring. If f (x ) ∈ R [x ] and if a ∈ R
is a root of f (x ), that is, f (a ) = 0, prove that there is a factorization
f (x ) = (x − a )g (x ) in R [x ].
Solution. Absent.
3.62
(i) Show that the following pseudocode implements the Euclidean algorithm ﬁnding gcd f (x ) and g (x ) in k [x ], where k is a ﬁeld.
Input: g , f
Output: d
d := g ; s := f
WHILE s = 0 DO
rem := remainder(d , s )
d := s
s := rem
END WHILE
a := leading coefﬁcient of d
d := a −1 d
Solution. Absent.
(ii) Find ( f , g ), where f (x ) = x 2 + 1, g (x ) = x 3 + x + 1 ∈ I3 [x ].
Solution. Absent.
3.63 Prove the converse of Euclid’s lemma. Let k be a ﬁeld and let f (x ) ∈ k [x ]
be a polynomial of degree ≥ 1; if, whenever f (x ) divides a product of
two polynomials, it necessarily divides one of the factors, then f (x ) is
irreducible.
Solution. The proof is the same as for the corresponding result for integers.
3.64 Let f (x ), g (x ) ∈ R [x ], where R is a domain. If the leading coefﬁcient of
f (x ) is a unit in R , then the division algorithm gives a quotient q (x ) and a
remainder r (x ) after dividing g (x ) by f (x ). Prove that q (x ) and r (x ) are
uniquely determined by g (x ) and f (x ). ...
View Full
Document
 Fall '11
 KeithCornell

Click to edit the document details