Cigarette Smoking, CVD Risk, and Cessation Strategies 1002

Cigarette Smoking, CVD Risk, and Cessation Strategies 1002...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: CIGARETTE SMOKING, CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE RISK, AND CARDIOVASCULAR IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION SMOKING CESSATION SMOKING Adapted and Modified from: Adapted Luepker RV, Lando HA. Tobacco Use and Passive Smoking, in: Wong ND, Black HR, Gardin JM, eds. Preventive Cardiology, Mc Graw Hill, 2000 and Mc NANCY HOUSTON MILLER, R.N., B.SN., Stanford University Roger Blumenthal, MD et al ACC Prevention Guidelines 2007 ____________________________________________________________ Smoking Statement Issued in 1956 by American Heart Association ___________________________________________________________ “It is the belief of the committee that much greater knowledge is needed before any conclusions can be drawn concerning relationships between smoking and death rates from coronary heart disease. The acquisition of such knowledge may well require the use of techniques and research methods that have not hitherto been applied to this problem.” Circulation 1960; vol. 23 ___________________________________________________________ Smoking: Mortality 33.5% of smoking-related deaths among Americans are cardiovascular-related Male smokers die an average of 13.2 years earlier than male nonsmokers Female smokers die an average of 14.5 years earlier than female nonsmokers Current cigarette smoking is a powerful independent predictor of sudden cardiac death in patients with CHD Cigarette smoking results in a two- to threefold risk of dying from CHD Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2301–2305. Surgeon General’s Health Consequences of Smoking, 2004. CDC/NCHS. Tobacco-Related Mortality, Fact Sheet. CDC.gov/tobacco. February 2004. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2005 Update, AHA. • MMWR, Vol. 51, No. 14, 2002, CDC/NCHS. CHD Risk by Cigarette Smoking. Filter Vs. Non-filter. Framingham Study. Men <55 Yrs. 14-yr. Rate/1000 250 Non-Smoker Reg. Cig. Smoker Filter Cig. Smoker 200 150 206 210 100 210 119 112 50 59 0 Total CHD Myocardial Infarction Percent of Population 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 37.3 33.4 24.1 23.9 20.4 20.2 18.9 17.8 15 Men NH White NH Black Hispanic 11.3 Women Asian American Indian or Alaska Native Prevalence of current smoking for Adults age 18 and older by race/ethnicity and sex (NHIS:2004). Source: MMWR. 2004;54:1121-24. NH – non-Hispanic. Percent of Population 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 24.9 27 24.8 19.2 14 NH Whites 11.9 NH Blacks Males Hispanics Females Prevalence of high school students in grades 9-12 reporting current cigarette smoking by race/ethnicity and sex. (YRBS:2005).Source: MMWR. (YRBS:2005).Source: 2006;55:SS-5. June 9, 2006. . NH – non-Hispanic. 2006;55:SS-5. • TOBACCO USE AS A CARDIOVASCULAR RISK TOBACCO FACTOR FACTOR • OVERVIEW OF SMOKING CESSATION AND THE OVERVIEW IMPORTANCE OF INTERVENING IN CLINICAL PRACTICE PRACTICE • LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE LESSONS IMPLEMENTATION AND DISSEMINATION OF A SUCCESSFUL RESEARCH PROGRAM IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED • INTRODUCING SYSTEM - WIDE CHANGES FOR INTRODUCING SUCCESS WITH CARDIAC AND OTHER HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED SMOKING: THE FACTS SMOKING: •FIFTY MILLION AMERICANS SMOKE (1 IN 4 ADULTS) •FIFTY PERCENT ATTEMPT TO QUIT ANNUALLY •ONLY 42% OF M.I. SMOKERS RECEIVED SMOKING ONLY CESSATION INTERVENTIONS AT HOSPITAL DISCHARGE (NRMI II) (NRMI •ONLY 21% OF SMOKERS RECEIVED COUNSELING @ ONLY CLINIC VISITS (1995) CLINIC •TREATMENT IS MOST OFTEN OFFERED TO THOSE TREATMENT WITH TOBACCO-RELATED DISEASES WITH •DIRECT/INDIRECT MEDICAL COSTS APPROACH DIRECT/INDIRECT $130 BILLION ANNUALLY $130 U.S. Deaths Attributable to Cigarette Smoking, 1994, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Chronic Lung Disease Lung Cancer 81000, 19% 72000, 17% 24000, 6% 32000, 7% 98000, 23% 123000, 28% Coronary Heart Disease Other Cancers Stroke Other CIGARETTE SMOKING MORTALITY CIGARETTE • ONE IN EVERY FIVE DEATHS FROM CARDIOVASCULAR ONE DISEASE IN THE UNITED STATES IS SMOKING-RELATED DISEASE • ON AVERAGE, SMOKERS DIE SEVEN YEARS EARLIER ON THAN NONSMOKERS. THAN • 430,700 DEATHS OCCUR ANNUALLY FROM CIGARETTE 430,700 SMOKING WITH 75% BEING DUE TO CANCERS AND HEART DISEASE. HEART • DEATHS FROM LUNG CANCER AMONG WOMEN HAVE HAVE INCREASED 400%. IN 1994, 64,300 WOMEN DIED FROM LUNG CANCER AND 44,300 DIED FROM BREAST CANCER. LUNG MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT, 1997 AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY, ATLANTA GEORGIA, 1996. Cigarette Smoking as a CHD Risk Factor • In PDAY study of autopsies performed on 1443 men and women aged 15-34 years, smoking was associated with excess of fatty streaks and raised lesions in the abdominal aorta. • Mechanism of injury from cigarette smoking may come from injury to endothelium, and acute effects ma include alterations in clotting, platelet adhesion, and coronary vasoconstriction due to nicotine. • Relative risk of CHD death from MRFIT study 2.1 for 1-25 cigarettes/day rising to 2.9 for >25 cigarettes/day • Acute MI and sudden death strongly associated with cigarette smoking. • Cigarette smoking has additive effect to CHD risk above lipids, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension Cohort Studies of Environmental Tobacco Smoke and CHD Source Hirayama Garland Svendsen Helsing Location,Date Japan 1984 US 1985 US 1987 US 1988 Population 91,540 695 1245 19035 RR (95% CI) 1.2 (0.9-1.4) 2.7 (0.7-10.5) 2.2 (0.7-6.9) M 1.3 (1.1-1.6) F 1.2 (1.1-1.4) Hole Layard UK 1989 US 1995 7987 2916 2.0 (1.2-3.4) M 0.97 (0.7-1.3) F 0.99 (0.8-1.2) Tunstall-Pedoe UK 1995 2278 2.7 (1.3-5.6) Steenland US 1996 309599 M 1.2 (1.1-1.4) F 1.1 (-.96-1.3) Kawachi US 1997 32046 F 1.9 (1.1-3.3) Environmental Tobacco Smoke and CHD • 35,000-40,000 deaths annually from acute MI are associated with environmental tobacco exposure, significantly more than due to lung cancer. • Recent meta analysis of passive smoking incorporating home-based and workplace studies (1699 cases) showed relative risk of 1.49 (1.29-1.72) • Sidestream smoke released into the environment may be more toxic and nonsmokers who are exposed regularly develop various physiologic changes and are more sensitive than regular smokers. • Lower HDL-C and platelet abnormalities, higher CO levels and lower exercise tolerance are noted. Trends in Cigarette Smoking: High School Youth (Everett et al) 40 35 30 25 20 1991 1995 15 10 5 0 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade Percent of High School Students Who Reported Cigarette Smoking, 1995, CDC WV MO WY OH ME NE RI NJ IL TN MT CO SC NC GA CA UT 0 10 20 30 40 50 Percent of Adults Who Reported Cigarette Smoking, 1996, CDC KY OH MO WV AK NC IL VA DE VT MA NY CO NE NM CT MN MD CA UT 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Prevention and Intervention Strategies in Youth • School-based prevention programs – Social environment / influences • Community-based prevention programs – May enhance effects of school-based programs • State and federal prevention initiatives – Anti-tobacco media campaigns – Restrictions on tobacco advertising – Restrictions on tobacco availability to minors – Restrictions on smoking in public places including schools – Increased taxation Adult Cessation Strategies • Contingency contracting (wards for abstinence) • Social support (from clinician, group, family, friends) • Relaxation techniques (progressive relaxation, deep breathing) • Stimulus control and cue extinction (restricting where smoking takes place) • Coping skills • Reduced smoking and nicotine fading (gradual reduction) • Multicomponent treatment programs • Hypnosis • Acupuncture • Self-help (written materials, videos, tapes, hotlines, helplines) • Computer-tailored messages Time-to-Benefit of Smoking Cessation After Last Cigarette Within 20 minutes: BP decreases; body temperature, pulse rate returns to normal Within 24 hours: Risk of MI decreases Within 1 year: Excess risk for CHD is half that of a person who smokes At 5 years: Stroke risk is reduced to that of someone who has never smoked Within 15 years: CHD risk is the same as a person who has never smoked American Lung Association. www.lungusa.org/tobacco/quit_ben.html Counseling: 5 A’s Ask: Systematically identify all tobacco-users at every visit Advise: Strongly urge all smokers to quit Attempt: Identify smokers willing to try and quit Assist: Aid the patient in quitting Arrange: Schedule follow-up contact Estimated cessation rate (%) Efficacy of various behavioural support approaches 20 16.8 15 10.8 12.3 13.9 13.1 10 5 0 No intervention (reference group) Self-help Proactive telephone counselling Individual counselling Group counselling USDHHS. Treating Tobacco use and dependence. A clinical practice guideline. Rockville, MD AHQR 2000. EFFICACY OF SMOKING CESSATION INTERVENTIONS (1 YEAR QUIT RATES) INTERVENTIONS ACUPUNCTURE ---- HYPNOSIS ---- PHYSICIAN ADVICE 6% SELF-HELP METHODS 14% NICOTINE PATCH 11-15% PHYSICIAN ADVICE/SELF-HELP PAMPHLETS 22% AVERSIVE SMOKING (RAPID PUFFING) 25% PHARMACOTHERAPY/BEHAVIORAL THERAPY25% BEHAVIORAL STRATEGIES (GROUP PROG.) 40% Tailored vs. generic behavioural support material % Abstinent at 4 months Self-help materials tailored for the needs of individual smokers are more effective than standard materials 35 30.7 Generic materials Tailored materials 30 25 20 15 10 7.7 7.1 9 5 0 Light / moderate (<20 cig/day) Heavy (>20 cig/day) Cigarettes smoked per day Strecher VJ. Patient Educ Couns. 1999; 36: 107-117. Strecher VJ, et al. Journal of Family Practice. 1994; 39(3): 262–270. Pharmacologic Treatment Options TREATMENT POTENTIAL RISKS Nicotine patch Skin rashes and irritation Nicotine polacrilex (nicotine gum) Mouth soreness, hiccups, dyspepsia, jaw ache Nicotine nasal spray Nose and eye irritation, usually disappears within 1 week Nicotine inhaler May cause mouth or throat irritation Zyban (bupropion hydrochloride) Slight risk of seizure, contraindicated in those with eating or seizure disorders Nicotine Replacement Therapy Potent psychoactive drug that induces euphoria Effects are related to blood concentration and the rate of increase in concentration Safe in patients with cardiovascular disease Should be used as part of smoking cessation therapy; however, many individuals may quit without it Smoking and Nicotine Other toxins in tobacco smoke, not nicotine, are responsible for majority of adverse health effects >4000 different chemicals Tar, carbon monoxide, irritants, and oxidant gases >40 carcinogens The main adverse effect of nicotine from tobacco is addiction, which sustains tobacco use Nicotine dependence leads to continued exposure to toxins in tobacco smoke Smith et al. Food Chem Toxicol. 1997;35:1107–30. Hoffman and Hoffman. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1997;50:307–64. Benowitz NL. Nicotine Safety and Toxicity. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) Goal: Attenuate symptoms related to nicotine withdrawal Dysphoric or depressed mood Insomnia Irritability, frustration, or anger Anxiety Difficulty concentrating Restlessness Decreased heart rate Increased appetite or weight gain NRT: Treatment Options Forms of NRT: Gum, Patch, Inhaler, Lozenge, Nasal spray, Sublingual tablet All forms of NRT appear to be similarly effective NRT choice may be based on susceptibility to side effects, patient preference, and availability Little research on combinations of different types of NRT Limited evidence that adding another form of NRT to the nicotine patch increases the success rate Plasma nicotine concentrations for smoking and NRT Increase in nicotine concentration ( ng/ml ) 14 12 10 8 Cigarette Gum 4 mg 6 Gum 2 mg 4 Inhaler 2 Nasal spray Patch 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Minutes Balfour DJ and Fagerström KO. Pharmacol Ther. 1996;72:51-81. NRT: Benefit of Behavioral Support Limited Support Intervention Effect size 5% 5% Nicotine gum Nicotine transdermal patch 95% CI 4%-6% 4%-7% Intensive Support Intervention Nicotine gum Nicotine transdermal patch Nicotine nasal spray Nicotine inhalator Nicotine sublingual tablet Effect size 8% 6% 12% 8% 8% 95% CI 6%-10% 5%-8% 7%-17% 4%-12% 1%-14% West R, McNeill A and Raw M. Thorax. 2000;55:987-999. Silagy C, et al. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002; 1. Safety of NRT NRT is safe in most individuals with cardiovascular disease, even with concomitant smoking There is a negligible risk of cancer compared to the risk from continued smoking Although it is a potential fetal teratogen, the benefits outweigh the risks of smoking during pregnancy There is a low risk of abuse Buproprion (Zyban) Sustained release form of the antidepressant Acts by enhancing CNS noradrenergic and dopaminergic function Start 1 week before smoking cessation date 150 mg QD x 3d, then 150 mg BID x 60d Higher doses and longer duration with greater side effects and no clear benefit Buproprion (Zyban) vs. NRT Jorenby DE et al. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 4;340(9):685-91 Other Therapies: Limited Success Clonidine Nortryptiline (tricyclic antidepressant) Maclobemide (MAO-inhibitor) Buspirone (anxiolytic) Naloxone (opiate antagonist) Naltrexone (opiate antagonist) Amphetamines ‘Reduced risk’ cigarettes Includes low tar and ‘light’ cigarettes, and novel products that deliver nicotine with minimal tobacco combustion Low tar cigarettes have not be shown to substantially reduce health hazards of smoking but do provide sufficient nicotine to sustain addiction Some novel products may deliver fewer or lower levels of toxins but some deliver more carbon monoxide. Smoking cessation medications are most likely safer than any ‘reduced risk’ cigarette Smokeless tobacco Snuff or chewing tobacco has been suggested as a potential aid to harm reduction or smoking cessation Such products known to cause oral cancer Smokeless tobacco is addictive and not recommended for smoking cessation CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE “TREATING TOBACCO USE AND DEPENDENCE” “TREATING • 6,000 ARTICLES (1975-99) INCORPORATING 50 6,000 META-ANALYSES META-ANALYSES • REF: JAMA 2000; 283: 3244-3254 • AVAILABLE ON HTTP://WWW.AHQR.GOV U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES THE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE ON SMOKING THE WHAT’S NEW? •TREATMENT OF TOBACCO MUST BE CONSIDERED A TREATMENT CHRONIC DISEASE CHRONIC •ALL CLINICIANS SHOULD OFFER AT LEAST A 3 MIN ALL COUNSELING INTERACTION AT EVERY VISIT COUNSELING •ALL SMOKERS WILLING TO QUIT SHOULD BE OFFERED ALL PHARMACOTHERAPY (EXCEPTIONS: PREGNANT/ BREAST - FEEDING WOMEN, ADOLESCENTS, THOSE WITH MEDICAL CONTRAINDICATIONS, OR < 10 CIGS/DAY) CIGS/DAY) THE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE ON SMOKING THE WHAT’S NEW? •CLINICIANS AND HEALTH CARE DELIVERY CLINICIANS SYSTEMS MUST IDENTIFY, DOCUMENT, AND TREAT EVERY TOBACCO USER TREAT •INSURERS AND PURCHASERS SHOULD INSURERS REIMBURSE: REIMBURSE: a. COUNSELING/PHARMACOTHERAPY FOR a. PATIENTS PATIENTS b. CLINICIANS WHO PROVIDE TOBACCO b. DEPENDENCE TREATMENT DEPENDENCE PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR SMOKING CESSATION: HOW DO THEY DIFFER? AMA - (1) ALL CHRONIC STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PTS IDENTIFIED AS SMOKERS DURING THE REPORTING YEAR (2) ALL CHRONIC STABLE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PTS WHO RECEIVE TOBACCO CESSATION INTERVENTION IN THE REPORTING YEAR HCFA - ALL AMI PTS. SMOKING WITHIN ONE YEAR PRIOR TO ADMISSION WHO RECEIVE SMOKING CESSATION ADVICE OR COUNSELING DURING HOSPITALIZATION PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR SMOKING CESSATION: HOW DO THEY DIFFER? CESSATION: NCQA - BY SURVEY ALL CURRENT/RECENT QUITTERS THAT HAD ONE OR MORE VISITS INDICATING THEY RECEIVED ADVICE TO QUIT FROM AN MCO PRACTITIONER FROM JCAHO - ALL AMI PATIENTS SMOKING WITHIN THE JCAHO YEAR PRIOR TO ADMISSION WHO RECEIVE SMOKING CESSATION ADVICE OR COUNSELING DURING HOSPITALIZATION DURING POINT OF ACCESS: THE USE OF HOSPITALS FOR SMOKING CESSATION • 30-40 MILLION PEOPLE HOSPITALIZED ANNUALLY • 20-30% OF HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS SMOKE • MOST SMOKERS HAVE HAD TO QUIT • GREATER MOTIVATION TO QUIT • OPPORTUNITY FOR COUNSELING GENERAL INTERVENTION METHODS METHODS INHOSPITAL • RN/MD COUNSELING • AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS • SELF-HELP PAMPHLETS POSTHOSPITAL • RN INITIATED PHONE CALLS: WEEKLY X 2-3 WEEKS MONTHLY X 4-6 MONTHS • NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY • 1-2 FACE-TO-FACE VISITS AS NEEDED DISSEMINATION OF “STAYING FREE” SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM SMOKING PRIMARY AIM • TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVENESS OF INITIAL TO IMPLEMENTATION INTO SEVERAL HOSPITALS IN SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA SAN SECONDARY AIM • TO IMVESTIGATE FACTORS THAT PREDICT TO SUSTAINABILITY OF STAYING FREE SUSTAINABILITY STAYING FREE INTERVENTION STAYING WHAT PATIENTS RECEIVE: – A STRONG PHYSICIAN MESSAGE ABOUT THE STRONG HAZARDS OF SMOKING HAZARDS – A 17 PAGE WORKBOOK ON QUITTING SMOKING – A 16 MINUTE VIDEOTAPE SHOWN AT THE 16 BEDSIDE ABOUT HOW TO REMAIN AN EX-SMOKER EX-SMOKER – A RELAXATION AUDIOTAPE STAYING FREE INTERVENTION STAYING WHAT PATIENTS RECEIVE: – A COUNSELING SESSION AT THE BEDSIDE BY A COUNSELING HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL HEALTH – PHARMACOLOGICAL THERAPY AS NEEDED – FOLLOW-UP PHONE CALLS FROM HOSPITAL FOLLOW-UP STAFF AND/OR PUBLIC HEALTH (1 TO 4) STAFF – OUTPATIENT REFERRALS TO PUBLIC HEALTH OUTPATIENT PROGRAMS AND OTHER LOCAL RESOURCES PROGRAMS STANDARD PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD • STAYING FREE HOSPITAL ADVISORY BOARD – MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM COMPRISED OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY PHYSICIANS, PSYCHOLOGISTS, NURSING STAFF, SOCIAL WORKERS, RESPIRATORY THERAPISTS AND OTHERS • PHYSICIAN ORIENTATION – HOT PINK STAYING FREE STICKERS PLACED ON HOT STAYING PATIENT CHARTS TO CUE PHYSICIANS TO DELIVER STRONG MESSAGE STRONG – PHYSICIAN INFORMATION POCKET CARDS – GRAND ROUNDS OR MONTHLY STAFF MEETING PRESENTATIONS REGARDING PHYSICIANS’ KEY PRESENTATIONS ROLE IN SMOKING CESSATION ROLE STANDARD PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD • PATIENT IDENTIFICATION – – – COMPUTERIZED ADMISSIONS FORMS OR PAPER ADMISSIONS SLIPS NURSING HISTORIES SELF REFERRAL TRIGGERED BY PUBLICITY MATERIALS (E.G., SELF POSTERS) POSTERS) – IDENTIFICATION QUESTIONS “HAVE YOU SMOKED ANY TOBACCO PRODUCTS IN THE PAST 30 HAVE DAYS?” DAYS?” “ARE YOU WILLING TO MAKE AN ATTEMPT TO QUIT SMOKING DURING ARE THIS HOSPITALIZATION?” • REFERRAL – – – PHYSICIANS, CASE MANAGERS, NURSING AND UNIT STAFF DEDICATED STAYING FREE TELEPHONE LINE DEDICATED STAYING REFERRAL SLIPS STANDARD PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD • PATIENT EDUCATION – NURSING AND/OR INTERVENTION STAFF NURSING PROVIDE PATIENT WORKBOOK, VIDEOTAPE AND RELAXATION AUDIOTAPE AND • FOLLOW-UP TELEPHONE CONTACT – 1 TO 4 TIMES POST DISCHARGE MODEL I: A VA HOSPITAL PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM • SPECIAL FEATURES: – INTERVENTION PROVIDED BY PSYCHOLOGISTS, INTERVENTION PSYCHOLOGY INTERNS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE NURSE NURSE – USE OF CLOSED CIRCUIT TV TO SHOW VIDEO – USE OF COMPUTERIZED STAYING FREE TEMPLATES USE STAYING TO DOCUMENT INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS’ ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS MEDICAL – STAYING FREE GROUP E-MAIL CREATED TO DISSEMINATE INFORMATION/UPDATES TO TEAM DISSEMINATE – “ASK ME ABOUT STAYING FREE” ID TAGS FOR STAFF ASK STAYING MODEL II: A COUNTY HOSPITAL SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER • SPECIAL FEATURES: – INTERVENTION PROVIDED BY PHYSICIANS – FOLLOW-UP PHONE CALLS PROVIDED BY SANTA FOLLOW-UP CLARA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH TOBACCO PREVENTION AND EDUCATION PROGRAM PREVENTION – SPANISH AND VIETNAMESE LANGUAGE SPANISH VERSIONS OF STAYING FREE STAYING – CERTIFICATES OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR PATIENTS MODEL III: COMMUNITY HOSPITALS • SPECIAL FEATURES: – MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICES INTERVENTION PROVIDED BY CARDIAC REHABILITATION INTERVENTION AND A DIVERSE TEAM OF VOLUNTEERS (NURSING STUDENT, FORMER CARDIAC REHABILITATION PATIENTS, MENDED HEARTS VOLUNTEERS, RETIRED COUNSELORS) MENDED DEDICATED STAYING FREE PHONE LINE DEDICATED STAYING – COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF LOS GATOS INTERVENTION PROVIDED BY STAFF CHAPLAIN COMPUTERIZED IDENTIFICATION OF ALL SMOKERS AT COMPUTERIZED ADMISSION ADMISSION MODEL IV: A UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL MODEL STANFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL • SPECIAL FEATURES: – PARTNERSHIP WITH COMMUNITY AND PATIENT PARTNERSHIP RELATIONS PROGRAM RELATIONS – INTERVENTION PROVIDED BY “SMOKING INTERVENTION CESSATION ADVISORS,” (HEALTH PROFESSIONAL VOLUNTEERS AND MEDICAL SCHOOL TRACK UNDERGRADUATES) MAKING HOSPITAL-WIDE SYSTEM LEVEL CHANGES THAT SUCCEED CHANGES STEP 1: DETERMINE PERCENTAGE OF ALL SMOKERS DETERMINE ENTERING A HOSPITAL WHO SMOKED IN PAST 30 DAYS PAST • ADMISSION SHEETS • FACE TO FACE CONTACT (2-4 WEEKS) MAKING HOSPITAL-WIDE SYSTEM LEVEL CHANGES THAT SUCCEED CHANGES STEP 2: ACTIVELY SCREEN ALL SMOKERS • UTILIZE COMPUTERIZED ADMISSION FORM • INCORPORATE INTO NURSING HISTORIES • INTEGRATE AS PART OF STANDING CCU/CSU INTEGRATE ADMISSION ORDERS ADMISSION • INCORPORATE AS A VITAL SIGN • USE PATIENT STICKERS MAKING HOSPITAL-WIDE SYSTEM LEVEL CHANGES THAT SUCCEED CHANGES STEP 3: EXPECT ALL HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS TO INTERVENE TO • ASK ABOUT SMOKING STATUS APPROPRIATELY • OFFER MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEW • DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT DOCUMENT, (TRACKING FORM, PROGRESS NOTES) (TRACKING MAKING HOSPITAL-WIDE SYSTEM LEVEL CHANGES THAT SUCCEED CHANGES STEP 4: TRAIN ALL MD’s TO RESPOND • ASK ABOUT SMOKING STATUS APPROPRIATELY • OFFER STRONG, CREDIBLE MESSAGE ABOUT OFFER QUITTING QUITTING • DETERMINE NEED FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL DETERMINE THERAPY THERAPY • DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT DOCUMENT, (MEDICAL RECORD, TRACKING FORM) (MEDICAL MAKING HOSPITAL-WIDE SYSTEM LEVEL CHANGES THAT SUCCEED CHANGES STEP 5: CONSIDER A SYSTEM TO OFFER SELF-HELP CONSIDER MATERIALS AND BEHAVIORAL COUNSELING MATERIALS • STANDARDIZE PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS • UTILIZE CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION FOR UTILIZE VIDEOTAPES VIDEOTAPES • DETERMINE WHO CAN BE TRAINED TO PROVIDE DETERMINE BEHAVIORAL COUNSELING (ie. VOLUNTEERS, CANDIDATE MEDICAL STUDENTS, CHAPLAINS, NURSES, PSYCHOLOGISTS) NURSES, • PROVIDE A LIST OF COMMUNITY RESOURCES MAKING HOSPITAL-WIDE SYSTEM LEVEL CHANGES THAT SUCCEED CHANGES STEP 6: DETERMINE A MECHANISM FOR FOLLOW-UP • USE SMOKING INTERVENTIONISTS TO UNDERTAKE USE PATIENT FOLLOW-UP PATIENT • OFFER TELEPHONE CONTACT BY HEALTH CARE OFFER PROFESSIONALS ALREADY MAKING CALLS PROFESSIONALS • INTEGRATE CALLS WITHIN PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT. • USE CENTRALIZED TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR ALL USE SMOKERS WITHIN COMMUNITY SMOKERS • DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT, DOCUMENT Clinician’s Guide, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Quit Smoking Action Plan, American Lung Association ...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online