# m8l02 - S ECTION 1.2 1.2. T HE R EMAINDER T HEOREM 9 T HE R...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

SECTION 1.2 THE REMAINDER THEOREM 9 1.2. T HE R EMAINDER T HEOREM Our goal in this section is to explain why Taylor polynomials make such nice approxima- tions to certain functions. The object of interest for us is therefore the remainder term , R n x f x T n x . While you may be accustomed to “remainder” being a notion from division, here we are using its more general meaning as “the part left over.” Three remainder terms for sin x (centered at 0 ) are shown below. As can be seen from these plots, the Taylor polynomials for sin x give better and better approximations near x 0 . 1 1 π π R 1 x 1 1 π π R 3 x 1 1 π π R 5 x If we can show that the remainder term is close to 0 , then that means that the Taylor polynomial is a good approximation to the function. For example, consider the remainder terms plotted above; T 5 x is a better approximation to sin x than T 3 x because R 5 x is close to 0 for more values of x than R 3 x . Our main tool in bounding the remainder term is, somewhat surprisingly, a result from Calculus I. Rolle’s Theorem. Suppose that f is a differentiable function. If f a f b for some a b then there is at least one number c between a and b at which f c 0 . Rolle’s Theorem is named after the French mathematician Michael Rolle (1652–1719), although it also appears (without proof) in the 12th century work of the Indian astronomer Bh¯askara II (circa 1114–1185). In order to show how Rolle’s Theorem can possibly tell us anything about Taylor poly- nomials, we begin with the following problem. Example 1. Determine how close the Taylor polynomial of degree 3 for sin x centered at 0 , T 3 x x x 3 6 , is to sin x at the point x 1 2 . Of course, there is an easy way to cheat: just compute the difference between T 3 1 2 and sin 1 2 . In fact, we did this in the last section. But let’s pretend for a moment that we don’t have access to calculators or computers, so we have to estimate the error, rather than simply compute the error. This is a valuable exercise because error estimates are useful theoretically.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
10 CHAPTER 1T AYLOR POLYNOMIALS Solution. There is certainly some value of K for which sin 1 2 T 3 1 2 K 1 2 4 , because we could just solve for K (if we did so, we would Fnd that K 0 . 00414 , but remember that we are pretending not to have calculators!). Let K be this value. Now deFne the function F x by F x sin x T 3 x Kx 4 . This function is 0 at two points: 0 (which is, not coincidentally, the center), and 1 2 , because that’s how we deFned K . Therefore we can apply Rolle’s Theorem to see that F x sin x T 3 x 4 3 is 0 at some point c 1 between 0 and 1 2 . But F x is also 0 at x 0 , because sin x T 3 x at x 0 and 4 3 is 0 at x 0 . Using Rolle’s Theorem again, we see that F x sin x T 3 x 12 2 is 0 at some point c 2 between 0 and c 1 . Again, F 0 0 , so Rolle’s Theorem says that F x sin x T 3 x 24 is 0 at some point c 3 between 0 and c 2 . Still, F 0 0 , so we can apply Rolle’s Theorem once again: F 4 sin 4 x T 4 3 x 24 K is 0 at some point c 4 between 0 and c 3 . This is the point we are really interested in, so let’s set c c 4 . Notice that T 4 3 x is 0 , because T 3 x
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 12/27/2011 for the course MAC 1114 taught by Professor Gentimis during the Spring '11 term at University of Florida.

### Page1 / 9

m8l02 - S ECTION 1.2 1.2. T HE R EMAINDER T HEOREM 9 T HE R...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online