Lect07and08_Slides

# Lect07and08_Slides - Mixed MixedStrategies Keepem guessing...

This preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

ixed rategies Mixed Strategies Keep ‘em guessing

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
ixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibrium A mixed strategy is one in which a player plays his available ure rategies with certain probabilities pure strategies with certain probabilities. Mixed strategies are best understood in the context of repeated games, where each player’s aim is to keep the other player(s) guessing, for example: Rock, Scissors Paper. If each player in an n player game has a finite number of pure rategies then there exists at least one equilibrium strategies, then there exists at least one equilibrium in (possibly) mixed strategies. (Nash proved this). If there are no pure strategy equilibria, there must be a unique mixed strategy equilibrium. However, it is possible for pure strategy and mixed strategy Nash equilibria to coexist, as in the Chicken game.
ample 1: Tennis Example 1: Tennis Let p be the probability that Serena chooses DL, so 1 p is the probability that she chooses CC. t be the probability that Venus positions herself for DL 1 Let q be the probability that Venus positions herself for DL, so 1 q is the probability that she positions herself for CC. To find mixed strategies, we add the p mix and q mix options. Venus Williams DL CC q-mix Serena Williams DL 50 , 50 80 , 20 50q+80(1 q) 50q+20(1 q) CC 90 , 10 20 , 80 90q+20(1 q) 10q+80(1 q) p mix 50p+90(1 p) 50p+10(1 p) 80p+20(1 p) 20p+80(1 p)

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
Row Player’s Optimal Choice of p Chose p so as to equalize the payoff your opponent receives from playing either pure strategy. This requires understanding how your opponent’s payoff varies with your choice of p . Graphically, in the Tennis example: For Serena’s choice of p, Venus’s expected payoff from laying DL is: Venus playing DL is: 50p+10(1 p) and from playing CC is: is made indifferent if Serena chooses 20p+80(1 p) p=.70
Algebraically Serena solves for the value of p that equates Venus’s payoff from positioning herself for DL or CC: 50p+10(1 p) = 20p+80(1 p), or 50p+10 10p = 20p+80 80p, or 40p+10 = 80 60p, or 100p = 70, so p = 70/100 = .70. If Serena plays DL with probability p=.70 and CC with probability =.30, then Venus’s success rate from 1 p .30, then Venus s success rate from DL=50(.70)+10(.30)=38%=Venus’s success rate from CC=20(.70)+80(.30)=38%. Since this is a constant sum game, Serena’s success rate is 100% Venus’s success rate = 100 38=62%.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
olumn Player’s Optimal Choice of Column Player s Optimal Choice of q Choose q so as to equalize the payoff your opponent receives from playing either pure strategy. This requires understanding how your opponent’s payoff varies with your choice of q . Graphically, in our example: For Venus’s choice of q, rena’s Serena s expected payoff from playing DL is: Serena is made 50q+80(1 q) and from playing CC is: 0q+20(1 ) indifferent if Venus chooses 60 90q+20(1 q) q=.60
lgebraically Algebraically Venus solves for the value of q that equates Serena’s payoff from playing DL or CC: 50q+80(1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

## This note was uploaded on 12/26/2011 for the course ECON 171 taught by Professor Charness,g during the Fall '08 term at UCSB.

### Page1 / 26

Lect07and08_Slides - Mixed MixedStrategies Keepem guessing...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 8. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online