204A-problems

204A-problems - Collection of Practice Problems Econ 204A Henning Bohn In previous years students have often asked me about practice problems in

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 Collection of Practice Problems Econ 204A Henning Bohn * In previous years, students have often asked me about practice problems in addition to the problem sets. Here is a collection. Some will be assigned for the weekly problem sets. I hope the others are useful for practice. Request : Please tell me about errors or ambiguities. Many of the questions below are old exam problems. As I am updating the course over the years, the notation, references, and sequencing has changed, which means that some old problems may have lost educational value without me noticing immediately. So if a problem seems obscure to you, please let me know. (Your incentive: your problem set might shrink if you convince me that a problem is unclear.) Part 1 : 1.1. Consider the two-period consumption model: Individuals have initial assets A, earn interest r on assets, and earn wage income ( w 1 , w 2 ) . They maximize utility U = u ( c 1 ) + β u ( c 2 ) . a. Assume u ( c ) = ln( c ) . i. Solve for optimal consumption and period-1 asset holdings as functions of wage income, the interest rate, and the time-discount factor β . Discuss under what conditions a marginally higher interest rate reduces consumption. [Discuss means: Interpret the solution. Conditions may be exact, or necessary, or sufficient. Hint: Distinguish cases with w 2 = 0 vs. w 2 > 0 .] ii. Show that the dependence of period-1 consumption on ( w 1 , w 2 ) can be expressed in terms of permanent income. b. Assume u ( c ) = 1 1 γ c 1 where > 0, 1 . Do the same as in (a). In the discussion, identify which results apply for all γ , and which ones only for γ greater or less than one. * Provided online for use by UCSB students. (C) Copyright 2011 Henning Bohn
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
2 1.2. Economists sometimes use the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) to express the effects of income changes on consumption: MPC is defined as the ratio Δ c t / Δ w t of a change Δ c t in consumption triggered by some change Δ w t in the current wage income that may or may not be accompanied by changes in future wages. This question will ask you to compute the MPC for several scenarios. (Hint: Use a spreadsheet for calculation.) Assume the permanent income model with planning horizon of n periods. Assume β =1/(1+r) with r=3% per year. Assume zero initial assets (A=0). a. Assume the time horizon is n=50 years (interpretation: roughly the life expectancy at age 30). Determine the MPC from i. a one-year wage increase; ii. an increase in wages that lasts 5 years; iii. a wage increase that last for 35 years [intuition: until about retirement]; iv. a tax reduction for one year followed by a tax increase of the same size in the next year. Discuss: How do the results compare? Do you find them surprising? Realistic? Why or why not? b. Determine the impact of a one-year wage increase for consumers with alternative planning horizons of, respectively: n=1 year; n=2 years; n=10 years; n=50 years; the limiting case of n=infinity.
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 12/26/2011 for the course ECON 240a taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at UCSB.

Page1 / 12

204A-problems - Collection of Practice Problems Econ 204A Henning Bohn In previous years students have often asked me about practice problems in

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online