This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Do Local Economic Development Programs Work? Evidence from the Federal Empowerment Zone Program * Matias Busso University of Michigan [email protected] Patrick Kline Yale University [email protected] Abstract This paper evaluates the impact of Round I of the federal urban Empowerment Zone (EZ) program on neighborhood level labor and housing market outcomes over the period 1994-2000. Using four decades of Census data in conjunction with information on the proposed boundaries of rejected EZs, we find that neighborhoods receiving EZ designation experienced substantial improvements in labor market conditions and moderate increases in rents relative to rejected and future zones. These effects were accompanied by small changes in the demographic composition of the neighborhoods, though evidence from disaggregate Census tabulations suggests that these changes account for little of the observed improvements. First version: April 18, 2006 This version: November 28, 2007 JEL Codes: H2, O1, R58, C21. * The authors would like to thank Soren Anderson, Timothy Bartik, John Bound, Charlie Brown, Kerwin Charles, John DiNardo, Taryn Dinkelman, Jesse Gregory, Jim Hines, Ben Keys, Justin McCrary, Gary Solon, Joel Slemrod, and Jeff Smith for encouragement and advice on this project. We would also like to thank participants of the University of Michigan Labor Seminar, the Michigan Public Finance Brownbag Lunch, and the Upjohn Institute Seminar for useful comments. This work has been supported (in part) by a grant from the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan. Any opinions expressed are those of the authors. Local economic development programs are an important, yet understudied, feature of the U.S. tax and expenditure system. Timothy Bartik (2002) estimates that state and lo- cal governments spend $20-30 billion per year on economic development programs with an additional $6 billion per annum coming from the federal government. However, little acad- emic work has been done examining the impact of these expenditures on local communities, largely because of the small scale and general diversity of most such programs. 1 This paper evaluates the federal urban Empowerment Zone (EZ) program, which constitutes one of the largest standardized federal interventions in impoverished urban American neighborhoods since President Johnson’s Model Cities program. With a mandate to revitalize distressed urban communities, the EZ program represents a nexus between social welfare policy and economic development efforts. Unlike conventional anti-poverty programs, Empowerment Zones aim to help the poor by subsidizing demand for their services at local firms, which has made them one of the few social welfare programs popular on both sides of the congressional aisle. In an era where non-entitlement spending on social welfare programs has been scaled back dramatically, the federal Empowerment Zone program has enjoyed rapid growth. After the initial funding of six first round EZs andZone program has enjoyed rapid growth....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 12/26/2011 for the course ECON 245a taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at UCSB.
- Fall '08