Unformatted text preview: 5. Is Wikipedia seriously flawed? Is it indeed a lazy technique / unreliable research tool? 6. Is it better to demand more credable, reliable and authorized materials as the basis for student research? Should Wikipedia add the disclaimer suggested by Anderson? 7. What other academic reserach sources do you buse? How do they compare to Wikipedia (better than, equal to, worse than)? 8. Does the fact that Wikipedia -being open to editing by anyone with Internet access- result in serious questions / doubt about the accuracy and reliability of its content? 9. Will editing of Wikipedia provide for student motivation and enhancement of writing and analytical reasoning skills?...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 12/23/2011 for the course NSSA 351 taught by Professor Hill during the Spring '08 term at RIT.
- Spring '08