Reading-Coburn_20Confronting_20Challenges_20AJPH_202004

Reading-Coburn_20Confronting_20Challenges_20AJPH_202004 -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: April 2004, Vol 94, No. 4 | American Journal of Public Health Corburn | Peer Reviewed | Reconnecting Urban Planning and Public Health | 541 RECONNECTING URBAN PLANNING AND PUBLIC HEALTH Confronting the Challenges in Reconnecting Urban Planning and Public Health | Jason Corburn, PhD, MCP Although public health and urban planning emerged with the common goal of prevent- ing urban outbreaks of infec- tious disease, there is little overlap between the fields today. The separation of the fields has contributed to un- coordinated efforts to address the health of urban popula- tions and a general failure to recognize the links between, for example, the built environ- ment and health disparities facing low-income populations and people of color. I review the historic con- nections and lack thereof be- tween urban planning and pub- lic health, highlight some challenges facing efforts to re- couple the fields, and suggest that insights from ecosocial theory and environmental jus- tice offer a preliminary frame- work for reconnecting the fields around a social justice agenda. ( Am J Public Health. 2004;94:541546) DESPITE THE COMMON historical origins and interests of urban planning and public health, only minor overlaps between the 2 fields exist today. One result of this disconnect is an uncoordi- nated approach to eliminating the glaring health inequalities facing the urban poor and people of color. 15 While public health is in- creasingly concentrating on bio- medical factors that might con- tribute to different morbidity and mortality rates between the well off and least well off, the field is just beginning to seriously investi- gate the role of land use decisions and how the built environment influences population health. At the same time, urban planning practice shows few signs of re- turning to one of its original mis- sions of addressing the health of the least well off. 3,5 The result is that work in the 2 fields is largely disconnected, and both areas are failing to meaningfully account for the economic, social, and polit- ical factors that contribute to pub- lic health disparities. 4 However, the public health significance of the disconnect between planning and public health has not gone unnoticed. A series of recent reports have emphasized the importance of re- connecting planning and public health. For example, a 2001 In- stitute of Medicine report titled Rebuilding the Unity of Health and the Environment emphasized that the environment should be un- derstood as the interplay be- tween ecological (biological), physical (natural and built), social, political, aesthetic, and economic environments. 6 The National Center for Environmental Health of the Centers for Disease Con- trol and Prevention, in its 2000 report Creating a Healthy Environ- ment: The Impact of the Built Envi- ronment on Public Health , argued for the reintegration of land use planning and public health, ex- plicitly linking transportation and land use planning to public...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/28/2011 for the course PLANNING & 10:832:101 taught by Professor Zitcher during the Fall '11 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 6

Reading-Coburn_20Confronting_20Challenges_20AJPH_202004 -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online