{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

File2-page36 - been 72 higher than its 1990 level urban...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Besley & Burgess (2004) Regulation and Development direction of labor regulation Figure 2: Labor Regulation in India: 1958-1992 year Andhra Pradesh -4 -2 0 2 4 Assam Bihar Gujarat Haryana -4 -2 0 2 4 Jammu & Kashmir Karnataka Kerala Madhya Pradesh -4 -2 0 2 4 Maharashtra Orissa Punjab Rajasthan 1960 1970 1980 1990 -4 -2 0 2 4 Tamil Nadu 1960 1970 1980 1990 Uttar Pradesh 1960 1970 1980 1990 West Bengal 1960 1970 1980 1990 Andhra Pradesh grew at 6% p.a. - the paper predicts that it would have grown at 4.1% if there had been no policy change Without policy change, registered manufacturing output would
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: been 72% higher than its 1990 level ... urban poverty, 112% of its 1990 level ◦ West Bengal grew at -1.5% p.a. - the paper predicts 2.2 with no policy reform – Without policy change, registered manufacturing output would have been 24% higher than its 1990 level – ... urban poverty, 89% of its 1990 level ◦ Overall manufacturing growth: 3% as compared to 2.5% Development Economics, LSE Summer School 2007 33...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}