File2-page161 - some Frms in both states before the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Aghion et al. (2003) Openness and Economic Performance Pro-employer states (6): Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu Neutral Punjab, Uttar Pradesh. Pro-worker states (4): Gujarat, Maharastra, Orissa, West Bengal. A Simple Model of Industry Equilibrium Firms are heterogeneous in productivity and geographical locations Productiveness is drawn from a uniform density function θ [ 0 , 1 ] State-speci±c labor markets – State A is pro-worker and B is pro-employer labor costs are higher, ceteris paribus , in A as compared to B Equilibrium price clears the product market at the national level ( A + B ) Two regulatory constraints (i) entry costs (ii) ceilings to production Proposition 1. Assume w A > w B and b < ¯ b (barriers to entry are binding for
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: some Frms in both states before the reform). Then, de-licensing induces produc-tion reallocation from state A to state B , namely, S B > S A . Moreover, if the demand is sufFciently inelastic, then S B > and S A < . Proposition 2. Assume w A > w B and A < 1 (production ceilings are binding for some Frms in both states before the reform). Then, the elimination of barriers to production induces production reallocation from state A to state B , namely, S B > S A . Moreover, if the demand is sufFciently inelastic, then S B > and S A < . Empirical Method y ist = is + t + d it + r st + ( r st )( d it )+ ist Development Economics, LSE Summer School 2007 158...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/29/2011 for the course ECO 307 taught by Professor Dublin during the Spring '10 term at SUNY Stony Brook.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online