Poverty and Undernutrition correlated with household expenditure and arguably uncorrelated with its measurement error. E.g., income if independently measured, proxies of long-term income or wealth are other candidates. Use of instrumental variables leads to a small fall in the estimated elasticity. Fall is not suf±-cient to place the estimated elasticity in the ‘revisionist’ camp (e.g. Subra-manian and Deaton, 1998 paper, which the class is based on). Difference between estimates cannot be ascribed to methodological differences alone. (ii) Misreporting of food consumption: May be more pronounced in the case of expenditure surveys as opposed to 24-hour nutrition surveys. Food in-takes are not directly measured in expenditure surveys, food may be given to guests, agricultural labourers, servants or even animals but nonetheless recorded as household consumption. Food consumption by non-members is systematically related to household expenditure (richer households have
This is the end of the preview. Sign up
access the rest of the document.
This note was uploaded on 12/29/2011 for the course ECO 307 taught by Professor Dublin during the Spring '10 term at SUNY Stony Brook.