Unformatted text preview: • Then, x k ± ² as x ± ² . lim x ±² c x k has Limit Form c ± , which implies that the limit is 0 (regardless of whether c is positive, negative, or 0). • Also, x k ± ²³ as x ± ²³ , if x k is defined as a real quantity whenever x < 0 . Then, lim x ±²³ c x k has Limit Form c ±² , which implies that the limit is 0. If x k is undefined as a real quantity whenever x < 0 , then lim x ±²³ x k does not exist (DNE), and lim x ±²³ c x k does not exist (DNE), even if c = 0 . 5. Irrational Exponents; Roots of Negative Real Numbers. It is true that x k ± ² and lim x ±² c x k = 0 (for any real constant c ) for any positive real constant k . But what if k is irrational? For example, if k = ± , then how do we define something like 2 when x = 2? Remember that = 3.14159. ... Consider the corresponding sequence: 2 3 = 8 2 3.1 = 2 31 10 = 2 31 10 ± 8.57419 2 3.14 = 2 314 100 = 2 157 50 = 2 157 50 ± 8.81524 ±...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 12/29/2011 for the course MATH 150 taught by Professor Sturst during the Fall '10 term at SUNY Stony Brook.
 Fall '10
 sturst
 Limits

Click to edit the document details