Rubinstein2005-page75

# Rubinstein2005-page7 - nominal prices and wealth even if the budget set is unchanged Claim(Walras’s law If the preferences are monotonic then any

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

October 21, 2005 12:18 master Sheet number 73 Page number 57 Demand: Consumer Choice 57 Claim: x ( p , w ) = x p , λ w ) (i.e., the demand function is homogeneous of de- gree zero ). Proof: This follows (with no assumptions about the preference relations) from the basic equality B p , λ w ) = B ( p , w ) and the assumption that the behavior of the consumer is “a choice from a set.” Note that this claim is sometimes interpreted as implying that “uniform inﬂation does not matter.” This is an incorrect interpre- tation. We assumed, rather than concluded, that choice is made from a set independently of the way that the choice set is framed. Inﬂation can affect choice since behavior may be sensitive to the
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: nominal prices and wealth even if the budget set is unchanged. Claim (Walras’s law): If the preferences are monotonic, then any solution x to the con-sumer’s problem B ( p , w ) is located on its budget curve (and thus, px ( p , w ) = w ). Proof: If not, then px < w . There is an ε > 0 such that p ( x 1 + ε , . . . , x K + ε) < w . By monotonicity, ( x 1 + ε , . . . , x K + ε) Â x , thus contradicting the assumption that x is optimal in B ( p , w ) . Claim: If % is a continuous preference, then the demand function is con-tinuous in prices (and also in w , see problem set)....
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 12/29/2011 for the course ECO 443 taught by Professor Aswa during the Fall '10 term at SUNY Stony Brook.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online