Rubinstein2005-page126 - prize(chose(2 while in the second...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
October 21, 2005 12:18 master Sheet number 124 Page number 108 108 Lecture Nine Figure 9.4 1 is more risk averse than 2. You have $2000 in your bank account. You have to choose between 1. a sure loss of $500 and 2. a lottery in which you lose $1000 with probability 1 / 2 and lose 0 with probability 1 / 2. What is your choice? Now assume that you have $1000 in your account and that you have to choose between 3. a certain gain of $500 and 4. a lottery in which you win $1000 with probability 1 / 2 and win 0 with probability 1 / 2. What is your choice? In the first case, most people preferred the lottery to the certain
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: prize (chose (2)), while in the second case most people preferred the sure prize (chose (3)). Such a preference does not conflict with expected utility theory if we interpret a prize to reflect a “monetary change.” However, if we assume that the decision maker takes the final wealth levels to be his prizes, we have a problem: in terms of final wealth levels, both choices can be presented as being between a sure prize of $1500 and a lottery that yields $2000 or $1000 with probability 1 / 2 each....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/29/2011 for the course ECO 443 taught by Professor Aswa during the Fall '10 term at SUNY Stony Brook.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online