microbook_3e-page31

microbook_3e-page31 - else would have been greater than the...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
sweet it wasn’t Q: Would a 15 percent decrease in consumption of everything else a massive disruption in the economy? A: If you could consume the same amount of sugar that you did last year, but your consumption of everything else fell 15 percent, would you be happy? lesson from Cuba’s experiment x a country should produce at the point along its PPF, where the opportunity cost of producing a good (ex. sugar) equals the relative price of that good x Cubans suffered because their country produced at a point where the opportunity cost of producing sugar exceeded the relative price of sugar x Similarly, had Cuba allocated all of its resources to producing “everything else” and produced no sugar it also would have suffered o because at such a point, the opportunity cost of producing everything
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: else would have been greater than the relative price of everything else o (from the opposite perspective) because at such a point, the opportunity cost of sugar would have been less than the relative price of sugar Why did Bill and Colleen completely specialize in one good? x A country should completely specialize in the production of one good o ONLY if the relative price of that good is greater than the countrys opportunity cost of producing it at every point along the PPF o Bill and Colleens opportunity cost was constant all along their PPFs x the PPF I drew for Cuba assumes increasing opportunity cost i.e. Cubas opportunity cost of producing sugar increases as it produces more sugar Page 31...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/29/2011 for the course ECO 311 taught by Professor Willis during the Fall '10 term at SUNY Stony Brook.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online