IMG_0002_NEW_0019 - 'Grrrrrsiorl' a cateqorical statement...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
With the four standard categorical statements for use in valid categorical syllogisms V^-L tcV^"lt \^Aat ? Does it follovr from the fact that no dogs are fish that no fish are dogs? That is. can one validly infer from 'No A are B' to 'trh g ora A' ? /n4 All A are B to 'ALI I 6,fl- A' ? rw Dr Mc's Philosophy 001 (1101)Part Notes, Week 6#2 O Tips for the midterm. and 0 trVhy? So=e A are B'to '1t l b a,a At ? y?h Sci^ne A are not B' to' S;,^t 9 o,rt-,wt' A' ? fur ( t X ^fttt rf""f ,rff, ; Tne process we've been discussing is called:
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 'Grrrrrsiorl' a cateqorical statement by SwuPPt' *dr'ca@ -tlzrtns -lr-Thjs is ^ ,tal,^cl, t+tu+h ft'sunt\lmove for luegArt,tvp- u,nivuh,/S only. Conversion in those cases yields a hiUll'l e-tfrVo"(fznt statement r Note that which terms ^re d,bWtblr?ol SA,4s -tta- s?^L v Argument Analysis Step 1 : is M at!*ne,nL fef-ftld ? step 2: jt t' rel,oovun'wL tL. LU N I d" tut^&L{ s4set' ) Step 3: (iu -l"ane the reconstruction-make sure the argument really ts llx/1-'t"^,.'t ffi J 1 1 01 001 week6#2part O...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online