nov04 - (-x ) n =-( xn ) = 0, and we deduce that x + y I...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Math 5125 Friday, November 4 November 4, Ungraded Homework Remarks If M is an R -module, then 0 m = 0 = r 0, and ( - r ) m = - rm for all m M and r R . We shall use these elementary properties without comment. Exercise 10.1.3 on page 343 Assume that rm = 0 for some r R and some m M with m 6 = 0. Prove that r does not have a left inverse (i.e., there is no s R such that sr = 1). Suppose to the contrary that there is an s R such that sr = 1. Then 0 6 = m = 1 m = ( sr ) m = s ( rm ) = s 0 = 0 which is a contradiction and the result is proven. Exercise 10.1.9 on page 344 If N is a submodule of M , the annihilator of N in R is defined to be { r R | rn = 0 for all n N } . Prove that the annihilator of N in R is a 2-sided ideal of R . Let I denote the annihilator of N in R . First note that 0 I , because 0 n = 0 for all n N . If x , y I , then xn = yn = 0 for all n N , hence ( x + y ) n = xn + yn = 0 + 0 = 0 and
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: (-x ) n =-( xn ) = 0, and we deduce that x + y I and-x I . We have so far shown that I is an abelian group under addition. Suppose r R . Then ( rx ) n = r ( xn ) = r = 0 and ( xr ) n = x ( rn ) = 0, and we conclude that rx and xr I . This completes the proof that I is an ideal of R . Exercise 10.2.8 on page 350 Let : M N be an R-module homomorphism. Prove that ( Tor ( M )) Tor ( N ) (where Tor ( M ) indicates the torsion elements of M ). Let m Tor ( M ) . Then there exists 0 6 = r R such that rm = 0. Then 0 = ( rm ) = r ( m ) , which shows that m Tor ( N ) as required....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/02/2012 for the course MATH 5125 taught by Professor Palinnell during the Fall '07 term at Virginia Tech.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online