Group_Pres._Mkt_PLan_Grade_Rating_Form

Group_Pres._Mkt_PLan_Grade_Rating_Form - effectively...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Introduction to Marketing 2200 Group Marketing Plan Presentation Grade Evaluation Categories Richard Patterson Professor Winter 2012 Group Presenting - Name____________________________________________ Date:___________ Time: Start_____ Finish_____ *Time 10 Minutes Max (5% penalty for abuse of time allowed) CRITERIA % Weight COMMENTS Mark ========================================================================== 1. Analysis 25% 2. Interesting 15% 3. Continuity 15% 4. Informative 15% 5. Technology 10% (delivery) 6. Course Content Application Clarity 20% 1. Analysis: Strong evidence of factual interpretation of research findings supporting marketing plan. 2. Interesting: Keeps audience and professors attention 3. Continuity: Presentation flows well, logical, coherent and all delivery methodologies integrated
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: effectively towards the stated goal 4. Informative: Content, depth, key facts, communicates the marketing plan’s strategy 5. Technology: Used effectively to deliver the Marketing plan’s goals – classroom technology seamless. Delays in presentation due to unfamiliarity with technical support will result in a 5% penalty. 6. Clarity: Weighted against the stated presentation goal/s the Marketing plan content delivery is easily understood by audience and professor. Evidence of critical thinking skill application. 7. Respect of time assigned of 10 minutes – abuse of time will receive a 5% penalty. Professor’s Comments...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 12/31/2011 for the course ADMS 2200 taught by Professor Lao during the Spring '10 term at York University.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online