This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: expense, length of time, and complexity involved in tort suits; and difficulty in determining who is at fault. 2. Having read the section dealing with the use of mechanical devices and having read the case of Katko v. Briney in Chapter 3 ( pp. 47-50), what is your opinion on this case? Should people be able to use these kinds of devices to protect their property when they are away? What are the possible arguments for using these devices? What are the arguments against? From a public policy argument, which side should win out? Post your responses here. Please respond to at least two of your classmates' postings. I think that Katko is in the wrong in this situation, not Briney. What is the difference between a trap and a guard dog? I think that it doesn’t matter if you are home or not home....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/02/2012 for the course PA 310 taught by Professor Zakrocki during the Winter '11 term at Kaplan University.
- Winter '11