aging spine revised

aging spine revised - The Aging Spine The Aging Spine...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: The Aging Spine The Aging Spine Killinger Aging Spine Changes Aging Spine Changes • Age 0­4­nucleus pulposis present • 9­14: less nucleus, bilateral clefts form in anulus, at jts of Lushka • 20­35: Clefts enlarge and dissect disc towards midline • > 60: Disc is dry, no nucleus, ligament­ like, less volume, decreased ROM, more rigidity Other age­related spinal changes Other age­related spinal changes • • • • • • • • • Nucleus dries & becomes rigid (blends w/annulus) Hyaline endplates calcify Nutrients to disc decrease Decreased ligament elasticity (ROM) Flattened jts of Lushka Thicker ligamentum flavum Decreased muscle mass, bone density Increase thoracic kyphosis Anterior head carriage So, how can we assess age­related So, how can we assess age­related changes in spinal health and biomechanics of the spine? • Bone density: How? • Poor biomechanics:? • Health of discs? • Ligament elasticity? Introducing Kirkaldy­Willis… (KW) Introducing Kirkaldy­Willis… (KW) • Dysfunction­Subluxation or poor biomechanics may produce a focal swelling, pain, muscle splinting. • Instability­ Trauma or prolonged dysfx. Leads to aberrant motion, inability to “hold” the adjustment, chronic pain, ms. fatigue, etc. • Stabilization­The body tries to fuse or immobilize areas prone to disuse or trauma. The literature in review... The literature in review... A Chiropractic Clinical Approach to Aging, Degeneration, and the Subluxation. McCarthy, KA. TICC 2001;8(1);61­70 Template for Developing a Clinical Impression of the Aging Spinal Pain Patient. McCarthy KA.TICC 2002;9(2):60­67. More in the literature... More in the literature... • Waddell, Allen, and Nachemson’s writings on back pain and disability • Linton’s and Turk’s articles on psychosocial influences on pain (Spine 2000, Pain 1987, and text on back and neck pain; 2000) True or False? True or False? “ Degenerative changes, as seen on x­ray, are a fairly good indicator of the patient’s pain and/or functional status.” No, pain and disability are NOT No, pain and disability are NOT predicted by radiographic findings. Disc herniation (visible on MRI/CT) does not usually predict problems with spinal function. “Is it scientifically appropriate to use the ‘Radiographic Stages Of Generation’ images to explain to patients why they are experiencing pain?” Pointing out a radiographic Pointing out a radiographic finding and tying it to the patient’s pain or function is not only disingenuous, it may cause patient harm (chronic pain)*. However, there IS value in educating patients about improving biomechanics (related to posture, function, ergonomics, physical stressors and activities). Is this an scientifically accurate Is this an scientifically accurate and appropriate statement for chiropractors to say to patients? “The scientific research has shown that chiropractic can prevent or slow degenerative processes in the spine.” There is little scientific evidence There is that chiropractic changes the rate or level of spinal degeneration. But this may be changing due to the research being done at Palmer! Thanks to Dr. Henderson So, what should we do? So, what should we do? • Educate patients about the things they CAN do (supported by science) that ↓↓ pain and ↑ function related to the spine and joints. function related to the spine and joints. – Chiropractic care: ↓↓ pain and may ↑ jt mobility – Physical activities (best evidence) – Moderation in activities, diet, etc. (avoiding repetetive stress injuries) – Proper biomechanics, posture, lifting techniques, work habits, etc. – QUIT smoking! Should our recommendations be Should our recommendations be the same for everyone? • NO! The entire clinical picture must be viewed before clinical management plans are developed. (For chiropractic technique choices, and other recommendations!!) • All subluxations are not created equal • Kirkaldy­Willis revisited… Initial Technique Thoughts… Initial Technique Thoughts… • Consider the technique tools you now possess • Consider the patients you hope to serve • Consider the clinical goals of these patients (in the framework of Kirkaldy­ Willis) • Are you prepared? More specifically… More specifically… • What will I do (what tools will I use) for a • • patient who has acute joint dysfunction? What will I do for a patient who has become unstable? What will I do for the patient in the “stabilization” phase to reach the goal of HEALTHY AGING? • How will I prevent patients from progressing to the “instability” and “stabilization” phases? The tale of 3 patients…. The tale of 3 patients…. • If you care for everyone the same, (ignoring the overall patient’s clinical picture, phase of degeneration, etc.) chances are you will get – excellent results with some, – mediocre results with others, and – poor outcomes with a few. (We can do better than a toss of the dice!) Dysfunction Dysfunction • Goals: To prevent progression to chronic pain, or long­standing aberrant motion (instability) in the affected joints • Recommendations: – Specific chiropractic adjustments, – Prevention/health promo recommendations – Proper nutrition, rest, posture, phys. activity, etc. Instability Instability • Goals: Prevent long­standing aberrant motion, and chronic pain: stabilize joints • Recommendations: – Strengthen Postural Muscles (the great stabilizers) – Conservative spinal adjustments – Improve proprioception, small muscle coord. – Stress reduction – Proper diet, rest, physical activ., support (?) Stabilization (most often older pt.) Stabilization (most often older pt.) • Goals: To retain strength, flexibility and ROM • Recommendations: – – – – Yoga or flexibility training Spinal adjustments/motion focused intervention Gait/proprioceptive training Regular physical activity to maintain muscle strength around joints, and overall So, how does this relate to So, how does this relate to chiropractic technique choices? • • • Dysfunction: A broad palate; choices galore! Instability: Care needs to be exercised to not aggravate ligament laxity and joint instability (And, don’t ignore the postural muscles!). Stabilization: Need to balance the need for safety in adjusting (these may be older or more frail patients) with the need for MOTION; Either use techniques that incorporate movement into joints, or address movement in the form of other physical activities/recommendations/therapies. Case #1: Justin Case #1: Justin • A 25 year old student and rugby player • Presents with a localized area of taut and tender • • • muscles around T11­T­12 No other spine or health problems What are your/his clinical goals? What adjusting strategies may offer the best results? • What can you do to prevent this from becoming a chronic problem? Case #2: George Case #2: George • 75 year old African American male with a chief • • • • • complaint of stiffness and pain in the low back Long history of acute and chronic low back episodes What do you need to ask/rule out? What are yours/his clinical goals? What adjusting strategies may offer the best results? What else might you talk to patient about? Case #3: Lydia Case #3: Lydia • • • • • • • 30 year old Hispanic single mother of 2 Works 2 jobs; no college education Chief complaint: Pain in neck and mid back Radiation into right arm; + occas. left arm Long history of chiropractic care; doesn’t seem to hold her adjustments well What adjusting strategies may offer the best results? How will you prevent this from becoming a chronic problem? Coming up in class… Coming up in class… • Meet some people who are aging well. • Small group activity on chiropractic techniques and aging • Continue discussion of chiropractic techniques and aging patients: Demo Day ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/03/2012 for the course DIAG 712 taught by Professor Killinger during the Summer '09 term at Palmer Chiropractic.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online