{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Chapter 14 Notes

# Chapter 14 Notes - CHAPTER 14 APPORTIONMENT I Basics...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

CHAPTER 14: APPORTIONMENT I. Basics Example 1: Suppose a country consists of five states (North, South, East, West and Central) and representation in the National Assembly should be in proportion to each state’s population. The latest census figures are: North 9279 South 7217 East 5155 West 3093 Central 2062 Total 26,806 If there are 26 seats in the Assembly, how should they be apportioned among the five states? Solution: Let’s start by dividing the total population by the number of seats: ___________ . This tells us how many citizens each member of the National Assembly represents and is called the standard divisor . The number of seats each state is entitled to, called its quota , is North’s quota is _________ South’s quota is _________ East’s quota is _________ West’s quota is _________ Central’s quota is _________ The two formulas above can be combined to yield: Example 2: Suppose a later census is taken and the following population figures are revealed. How should the 26 seats be apportioned among the 5 states? Solution: Notice the quotas aren’t whole numbers any more. Round them off, you say? Std. Divisor = 1000 Standard Rounded State Population Quota Quota North 9061 South 7179 East 5259 West 3319 Central 1182 Total 26000 Standard Divisor: That doesn’t work either since the rounded quotas sum to 25, not 26. One state has to gain a seat here. The question is which one? First, some vocabulary. If we round down, we get what is called the lower quota . If we round up, we get what is called the upper quot a . The following notation is used: 9 061 . 9 = and 10 061 . 9 = Chapter 14 Page 1 State’s quota = seats of number population total population s State ' Standard Divisor = seats of number total population total State’s quota = ' tan state s population s ard divisor

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This problem of the rounded quotas not summing to the desired number is quite common. Sometimes the rounded quotas sum to a number that is too big. This problem became apparent in the late 18 th century. The U.S. Constitution, while requiring that the House of Representatives be apportioned proportional to each state’s population, didn’t spell out a precise method for doing this. Nor did it specify the size of the House. The first census was taken in 1790, 3 years after the Constitutional Convention. We are going to study five methods for solving this problem. One method considered by Congress, and the easiest to use, was advocated by Alexander Hamilton, America’s first Secretary of the Treasury. II. Hamilton’s method consists of three steps: 1. Calculate each state’s standard quota. 2. Give to each state a number of seats equal to its lower quota. 3. Give the remaining seats, one at a time, to the states with the largest decimal parts until there are no more remaining seats. Applying Hamilton’s method to our example: Standard Lower Decimal Additional Final State Population Quota Quota Part Seats Apportionment North 9061 9.061 9 South 7179 7.179 7 East 5259 5.259 5 West 3319 3.319 3 Central 1182 1.182 1 Total 26000 25 Standard Divisor: 1000 Example 3: Suppose the National Assembly is increased in size to 27 seats. What is the new apportionment using Hamilton’s method?
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}