This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: CS 151 Complexity Theory Spring 2011 Solution Set 6 Posted: May 23 Chris Umans 1. (a) We observe that the largest possible set shattered by a collection of 2 m subsets is m , since a set of size m + 1 has more than 2 m distinct subsets. The VC dimension of a collection of subsets succinctly encoded by a circuit C can therefore be at most  C  , since C can encode at most 2  C  subsets. Thus we can express VCDIMENSION as follows: { ( C,k ) : X X X i [  X  k and y X C ( i,y ) = 1 y X ] } Notice that  X  ,  X  , and  i  are all bounded by  C  (using the observation above), and that the expression in the square brackets is computable in poly(  C  ) time. Thus VCDIMENSION is in p 3 . (b) Let ( a,b,c ) be an instance of QSAT 3 (so we are interested in whether a b c ( a,b,c )). We may assume by adding dummy variables if necessary that  a  =  b  =  c  = n . As suggested our universe is U = { , 1 } n { 1 , 2 , 3 ,...,n } . We identify nbit strings with subsets of { 1 , 2 , 3 ,...,n } , and define our collection S of sets to be the sets S a,b,c = { { a } b if ( a,b,c ) = 1 otherwise for all a,b,c . There is a small circuit C that succinctly encodes this collection of sets given an element x = ( a ,k ) U and a set name ( a,b,c ), determining whether x S a,b,c requires only that we check if ( a,b,c ) = 1 (if it is not, then the set is the empty set and clearly x S a,b,c ) and then check if x { a } b (i.e., check whether a = a and b k = 1). Our instance of VCDIMENSION is ( C,n ). If is a positive instance, i.e., a b c ( a,b,c ) = 1, then the set U a = { a } { 1 , 2 , 3 ,...,n } of size n is shattered, because S contains sets of the form { a } b for all b . Thus the VC dimension of S is at least n . Conversely, if the VC dimension of S is at least n , then there is a set X of size n that is shattered by S . We observe that X cannot contain elements of two different subsets U a and U a because then the set consisting of these two elements cannot be expressed as the intersection of X with some set in S (all of our sets are subsets of some U a ). We conclude that X U a for some a , and the fact that it is shattered implies that sets of the form { a } b for all b must be present in S . This implies that b c ( a,b,c ), so we have a positive instance....
View Full
Document
 Fall '09

Click to edit the document details