00077___350e281261e31ef2e67e43eed456a8d9

# 00077___350e281261e31ef2e67e43eed456a8d9 - g's and g's...

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

56 TENSOR ANALYSIS Chap. 2 (m, r not summed). In general, pL # phm # p; # By. Here the first indices of the superscript and the subscript are associated with the coordi- nates with base vectors g's and the second indices with g's. The distinction between p; and prm disappear in Cartesian coordinates. One can easily show that (15) (16) gr = (gr . gm)gm = Phmgm , gm = (gm * gk)gk = (gk gm)gk = P(e,gk and that the p's are related by the metric tensors of the two coordinate systems: D; = Bmp& gr4 , P& = ii ''PAq gqm . From Eqs. (6) and (14), it can be seen that Thus, Eqs. (15) and (16) establish that the transformation between
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: g's and g's follows the tensor transformation law. A substitution of Eq. (16) into Eq. (15) and vice versa yield g~ = pik& = Pikp?grn gm = Pkmgk = P(e,&,'gr , which implies that We can now determine the transformation law for the components of v between different coordinate systems. Dotting both sides of the equation -r- 21 gr = vmgm with gi gives the transformation law (19) A vi = (gi ' g m ) P = p:mu". Similarly, dotting the same equation with gj gives the inverse transforma- tion Using the relations of the contravariant base vectors (21) A g' r= (g" . gm)gm = p&gm, gm = (g, . gm)g' = p;"gT,...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 01/04/2012 for the course ENG 501 taught by Professor Thomson during the Fall '05 term at MIT.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online