n and 0 xi then x x x t that satises

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 2 F11 Modern Portfolio Theory & CAPM – p. 20 Mean-Variance Optimization Formulations (cont’d) Formulation III: max 2τ µT x − xT Σx subject to eT x = 1 x the parameter τ ≥ 0 is a measure of the risk tolerance of an investor what if τ = 0? what if τ becomes very large? the efficient portfolio is optimally obtained for all τ ∈ [0, ∞) K.S. Tan/Actsc 372 F11 Modern Portfolio Theory & CAPM – p. 21 Method of Lagrangian Multipliers maximum/minimum of f (x) subject to the constraint g (x) = k , where xT = (x1 , . . . , xN ). Optimization Problem: The solution to the above optimization problem can be obtained via the method of Lagrangian multiplier: First, set up the Lagrangian function as follows: L(x, λ) = f (x) + λ[g (x) − k ] Second, derive the following optimality conditions ∂L ∂L = 0 i = 1, 2, . . . , N and =0 ∂ xi ∂λ Then x∗ = (x∗ , . . . , x∗ )T that satisfies the above 1 N optimality conditions are necessary and sufficient for the global optimum. K.S. Tan/Actsc 372 F11 Modern Portfolio Theory & CAPM – p. 22 An Example on Lagrangian Method K.S. Tan/Actsc 372 F11 Modern Portfolio Theory & CAPM – p. 23 Derivation of Markowitz Model K.S. Tan/Actsc 372 F11 Modern Portfolio Theory & CAPM – p. 24 Markowitz M...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/04/2012 for the course ACTSC 372 taught by Professor Maryhardy during the Fall '09 term at Waterloo.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online