Assignment2_sol - Winter 2011 SAINT MARYS UNIVERSITY...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Winter 2011 SAINT MARY’S UNIVERSITY FINANCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS, & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE FINANCE 3361 ASSIGNMENT #2 DUE FRIDAY, Feb. 4 th by 12:00 noon Problem #1 A firm is going to finance a new project 100 percent with debt, through a new bond issue. Since the firm is only using debt to finance the project, the NPV of the project should be calculated using the cost of debt as the discount rate. Is this statement true, false, or uncertain? Explain. Solution: The statement is false. The cost of capital for a new project depends on the use of funds, not the source. Even if this particular project will be funded with debt, it is probably only one of many projects that the firm undertakes. The firm, over time, will raise financing through a number of sources, including internal funds, new equity, new preferred shares, and new debt. The source of funding for this project is from the pool of available funds. Therefore the cost of capital for the project should be the WACC if the project has the same risk as the overall company, otherwise we should calculate the divisional WACC to accurately reflect the risk of the division. Problem #2 The little company you and your friend started in your parents’ garage has grown so much that you are now ready to take the firm public. In your discussions with one of the top investment dealers, you have been given a choice between two alternatives: Plan I : The investment dealer will underwrite the issue of 1 million shares at $14 per share. There will be an underwriting fee of 6.5 percent of the gross proceeds. Plan II : The investment dealer will accept the securities on a “best efforts” basis. The price will be $15 per share, and it is believed that 95 percent of the shares will be sold. The investment dealer’s fee will be $950,000. What will the net proceeds be under each plan? Which plan should you accept? Solution: Under Plan I , you will gross $14 x 1 million shares = $14 million and will pay $14 million x 0.065 = $910,000 in fees. The net proceeds are therefore $13,090,000. Under Plan II , only 95%, or 950,000 shares are expected to be sold, so the gross proceeds will be $15 x 950,000 = $14,250,000. After the dealer’s fees, net proceeds will be $14,250,000 – 950,000 = $13,300,000. Plan II appears to be better as you will receive more money and have sold fewer shares doing so. However, this option entails more risk for you and the company: if the IPO doesn’t go very well, you may raise far less money (and you will still pay the fixed fee).
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Problem #3 Motorola has several divisions, one of them being Integrated Electronics Systems Segment (IESS). This division supplies automotive electronics components. The company would like to determine the cost of equity for this division. They have identified a pure-play firm; Delphi Inc. The following information is given regarding Motorola and Delphi:
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/07/2012 for the course FIN 3361 taught by Professor Mishra during the Spring '11 term at Dalhousie.

Page1 / 8

Assignment2_sol - Winter 2011 SAINT MARYS UNIVERSITY...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online