lagrange-econ

# lagrange-econ - ECONOMIC APPLICATIONS OF LAGRANGE...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

ECONOMIC APPLICATIONS OF LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS MATH 232 Maximization of a function with a constraint is common in economic situations. The first section considers the problem in consumer theory of maximization of the utility function with a fixed amount of wealth to spend on the commodities. We consider three levels of generality in this treatment. The second section presents an interpretation of a Lagrange multiplier in terms of the rate of change of the value of extrema with respect to the change of the constraint constant. The first sub- section gives a general presentation, the second subsection illustrates this formula for a particular situation, and then the third subsection derives the formula in general. In the third section, we calculate a rate of change of the minimal cost of the output with respect to the change of price of one of the inputs. 1. Maximize Utility with Wealth Constraint 1.1. Three commodities. Assume there are three commodities with amounts x 1 , x 2 , and x 3 , and prices p 1 , p 2 , and p 3 . Assume the total value is fixed, p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 + p 3 x 3 = w 0 , where w 0 > 0 is a fixed positive constant. Assume the utility is given by U = x 1 x 2 x 3 . The maximum of U on the commodity bundles given by the wealth constraint satisfy the equations x 2 x 3 = λp 1 x 1 x 3 = λp 2 x 1 x 2 = λp 3 w 0 = p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 + p 3 x 3 . If we multiply the first equation by x 1 , the second equation by x 2 , and the third equation by x 3 , then they are all equal: x 1 x 2 x 3 = λp 1 x 1 = λp 2 x 2 = λp 3 x 3 . One solution is λ = 0 , but this forces one of the variables to equal zero and so the utility is zero. If λ = 0 , then p 1 x 1 = p 2 x 2 = p 3 x 3 w 0 = 3 p 1 x 1 w 0 3 = p 1 x 1 = p 2 x 2 = p 3 x 3 . Thus, one third of the wealth is spent on each commodity. This gives the maximization of U . 1.2. Maximize of a Weighted Utility. We make the same assumptions on the commodities as the last example, but assume the utility is given by U = x a 1 1 x a 2 2 x a 3 3 with a 1 > 0 , a 2 > 0 , and a 3 > 0 . This utility function gives a weight to the preference of the commodities as the solution to the 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
2 MATH 232 maximization problem shows. The maximum of U on the commodity bundles given by the wealth constraint satisfy the equations a 1 x a 1 - 1 1 x a 2 2 x a 3 3 = λp 1 a 2 x a 1 1 x a 2 - 1 2 x a 3 3 = λp 2 a 3 x a 1 1 x a 2 2 x a 3 - 1 3 = λp 3 w 0 = p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 + p 3 x 3 .
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern