R12 - Resisting Jim Crow: In-Depth Essay By Ronald L. F....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Resisting Jim Crow: In-Depth Essay By Ronald L. F. Davis, Ph. D. Untold numbers of black men, women, and children valiantly resisted white supremacy in the South during the Jim Crow era, often risking their very lives. It is impossible to know how many of the African Americans lynched by white mobs were men and women who had challenged Jim Crow by some overt act of defiance, such as walking proudly down the street or talking back to whites rather than stepping aside. Most of the victims the lynch mobs were murdered, however, for accidentally stepping out of line or due to trumped up charges, as depicted in the novel To Kill A Mockingbird . Sometimes, the victims were successful blacks who had aroused the hatred of jealous whites in the community, as was the case with Ida B. Wells-Barnett 's Memphis friend and neighbor, Thomas Moss. His only crime lay in owning a prosperous grocery store that competed with a white-owned store in the same neighborhood. His murder by lynching launched Wells-Barnett on a lifelong crusade against the epidemic of mob murder that targeted blacks, especially men, in the Jim Crow era. Most of the time, the victims of mob rage were just men and women, boys and girls, who had been in the wrong place at the wrong time-- innocent victims of Jim Crow America. Southern whites commonly but mistakenly believed that the lynched and murdered men had violated southern white women. In fact, according to historian Robert Zangrando, only 25 percent of the mob-murdered men were even accused of rape or attempted rape in the period from 1882 to 1968--and, almost all of these charges were trumped up. Anti-lynching crusader Ida B. Wells- Barnett put the figure even lower, based upon her studies of southern lynchings from 1882 to 1900. Because no systematic investigations ever occurred before the lynchings, this common notion that all the lynched men had assaulted white women was seldom challenged after the fact. Thus, the allegation stood as fact and became part of the racist political rhetoric white supremacists used in campaigns almost everywhere in the South and in much of the Midwest. Nor were innocent blacks victims of a lynch mob always picked at random--although many certainly were. Instead, white rage frequently focused on individuals who had crossed the boundaries (the invisible color lines) separating the races or had allegedly committed petty crimes against whites in the community. Some of the victims were men and women who had reputations for being trouble makers; some ran afoul of whites in their work or in business; others had affronted the supremacy of the white social order just because they were strangers or not properly submissive. For example, according to records, over 45 percent of the men and women lynched by white mobs were accused of killing or assaulting a white person.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/11/2012 for the course RACE REL 790:333 taught by Professor Williegin during the Fall '11 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 12

R12 - Resisting Jim Crow: In-Depth Essay By Ronald L. F....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online