nietzscheoverheads

nietzscheoverheads - naturally stronger. Notice that the...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals Central questions: 1. Where do our evaluative concepts (good and evil) come from? 2. What is the “value of these values themselves”?
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
According to Nietzsche, the earliest usages for the evaluative concepts of “good” and “bad” were significantly different from contemporary uses. Good: “Noble” “Good” is simply a name given to those things and activities preferred by the dominant social class. Bad: “Other” “Bad” things were simply those which were not preferred by the noble class.
Background image of page 2
The Slave Revolt in Morality With the rise of a “priestly” social leadership, the uses for evaluative terms is re-appropriated. “Good” now refers to the activities and characteristics that the priestly class prefers, and vice-versa for “bad”. In the resultant evaluative framework, it is the weak , and not the powerful, who are given preference and advantage. How does this happen?
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Ressentiment: A deeply-held jealousy of the
Background image of page 4
Background image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: naturally stronger. Notice that the new moral framework serves to protect those who would otherwise be susceptible to domination in the hands of the stronger. The naturally stronger are convinced that their own natural tendencies are “evil”, giving rise to two crucial mechanisms of “slave morality”: Guilt and conscience. 1. This view seems to presuppose that there is no such thing as an intrinsic sense of right and wrong. What do you think about that? Can you think of something that can’t be anything but right to do? Wrong? Let's Ruminate! 2 . Do you think this really is a plausible account of where our value judgments come from? Does any part of it not make sense? 3. Can you give any alternative account? 4. Suppose Nietzsche is right about this account of the origin of our morals. Is this really such a bad state of affairs after all?...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/12/2012 for the course PHIL 02 taught by Professor Toñoramirez during the Winter '11 term at DeAnza College.

Page1 / 5

nietzscheoverheads - naturally stronger. Notice that the...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 5. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online