SampleEthicsMemo-Hama1-2 - Memo To: Professor Joan’gecgtt...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Memo To: Professor Joan’gecgtt From: Mitsuhiro Hamakawa CC: Professor Christine Bauer-Ramazani Date: December 10, 2004 Re: Ethics Memo for Mitsubishi Introduction The left front tire of a Mitsubishi truck came off in Japan. A family tragedy was caused by the tire. It turned out that the tire was defective. The purpose of this memo is to describe the situation and the stakeholders, to state the ethical dilemma and core ethical values, to argue the possible solutions, to discuss what Mitsubishi actually did and what Mitsubishi should have done, and to express my opinion. The situation While a truck driver was his Mitsubishi truck on a city road on January 11“” 2002, one of the tires suddenly came off and hit a family. It injured two children and killed their mother. Car accidents caused by a defective tire had occurred before this accident Therefore, Mitsubishi had inspected its cars and trucks in private and already been aware of this defect. Stakeholders Stakeholders are the people who were affected by this accident. There were six stakeholders in this accident. One group of stakeholders was the victims, the family in this case, because they were accidentally injured by the defective tire. The second group of stakeholders was the drivers and customers of Mitsubishi because they might have caused such an accident unintentionally. The third group of stakeholders was employees of Mitsubishi because they would work over time, have their pay reduced, or lose their jobs if their company lost trust from customers. The fourth group of stakeholders was the investors of Mitsubishi because their stocks could decline, and they might lose their profits for the same reason as the employees’ case. The fifth group of stakeholders was the suppliers of Mitsubishi because the demand for parts would decline or vanish if Mitsubishi stock decreased or if Mitsubishi went bankrupt. Finally, the relatives of all stakeholders, who are stated above, are also stakeholders. If the concemed parties fiom an accident got injured or died, or if the concerned parties from their companies lost theirjobs, the relatives would grieve as well as suffer from a monetary problem. Ethical dilemma An ethical dilemma is a situation in which we should choose right or wrong. On the one hand, if Mitsubishi had published the defect, they should have repaired it, and it would have cost a lot of money. In addition, the publication might ruin Mitsubishi’s reputation, and its future proceeds might decline. HOWever, nobody will get injured. On the other hand, if Mitsubishi had concealed the defect, it would not cost them anything, and Mitsubishi would maintain their reputation and profit. However, somebody might get injured, find the defect, and sue Mitsubishi for criminal neglect. Core ethical values There are six core ethical values: trustworthiness, respect, caring, civic virtue and citizenship,justice and fairness, and responsibility. In this dilemma, trustworthiness, caring, and responsibility were involved. Customers and drivers trust that Mitsubishi produces reliable automobiles. In this case, Mitsubishi was afiaid that they would lose its trustworthiness by publishing the defect. In addition, Mitsubishi should care about users by providing alter-sales service. Mitsubishi should have recalled and repaired the defective automobiles if they had been aware of the defect. Furthermore, responsibility has two meanings in this dilemma. One is that Mitsubishi had to inform drivers and customers of the information about the defect. Another is that it should have recalled the tires and repaired the defect. The possible solutions Mitsubishi could choose four possible solutions: Mitsubishi publishes the defect, and then they recall its automobiles and repair flre defect. 0 Mitsubishi publishes the defect, but they do not recall its automobiles and do not repair them. 0 Mitsubishi does not publish the defect, ignores the defective automobiles, and repairs the defect on new cars. 0 Mitsubishi does not publish the defect and continues to manufacture its automobiles with defective tires. What Mitsubishi actually did More than 50 accidents caused by defective tires had already occurred before 1994, so Mitsubishi inspected secretly and found the defect in 1994. However, Mitsubishi had been concealing the defect and manufacturing automobiles with defective tires for ten years. Although dozens of car accidents caused by the defective tires happened fiom 1994 to 2004, Mitsubishi did not publish the defect. On January 11"“ 2002, the defective tire caused three casualties; nevertheless, Mitsubishi continued to hide the defect. Aflzer this accident, the police searched Mitsubishi car factories for two years and found the defect in the second search on January 27"“ 2004. Finally, Mitsubishi confessed to knowing about the defect. ‘ What Mitsubishi should have done Mitsubishi should have published the defect, repaired it, and stopped manufacturing possibly defective automobiles because it is the right thing to do according to the following core ethical values: caring and responsibility. Also, if Mitsubishi concealed the defect, and it came out later, it would cost much more than if Mitsubishi published the defect right after they found the defect; at worst, Mitsubishi might go bankrupt. My feeling about this situation Mitsubishi is one of the four largest Japanese financial conglomerates, and all my family cars are Mitsubishis. Japanese employees for Mitsubishi are trustworthy, so I also believed in Mitsubishi. Therefore, I am disappointed in the company. Although Mitsubishi has been inspecting all kinds of Mitsubishi automobiles for free, I, as well as a lot of Japanese, do not trust the company anymore, even though its employees are still trustworthy. Defects might occur in any other companies, but I believe that quick reaction to the defect is important to prevent customers fiom leaving. Rather, customers left the company because of concealing the defect. I hope that other companies learn from this lesson and never cause this kind of trouble. In the future, I will act as I think Mitsubishi should have if I run into the same kind of ethical dilemma. Conclusion Anyone can cause an ethical dilemma anytime, and it will affect the stakeholders. The best solution is that people having a dilemma choose an option according to the core ethical values. Therefore, Mitsubishi should have taken actions according to core ethical values, recalled its tires, and repaired them. 0 Page 2 ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/11/2012 for the course ACCOUNTING FI504 taught by Professor Joe during the Spring '10 term at Keller Graduate School of Management.

Page1 / 2

SampleEthicsMemo-Hama1-2 - Memo To: Professor Joan’gecgtt...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online