Site_Selection____Evaluation_Form

Site_Selection____Evaluation_Form - on criteria established...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
CM 426 -- FEASIBILITY STUDIES SITE SELECTION EVALUATION FORM _________ PROFESSIONALISM (Appearance, grammar, neatness) AND EASE OF UNDERSTANDING -- KISS PRINCIPAL (Presentation, Executive Summary, Conclusions, etc.) (8 pts) _________ POLITICAL AND LEGAL CRITERIA ANALYZED (Zoning, current uses, neighboring properties, etc.) (6 pts) _________ ALTERNATIVE SITES CONSIDERED (At least three alternative sites were considered and evaluated) (3 pts) _________ SPECIFIC CRITERIA ESTABLISHED TO JUDGE (Final site determined based
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: on criteria established by group. Objective analysis performed to reach conclusion. For example, distance to amenities, churches, schools, businesses, transportation, etc.) Explanation and/or matrix to determine sites – weighted averages, etc.) (10 pts) _________ RESEARCH (Quality and depth of perceived research, adjacent sites and development requirements included to make thorough site evaluation, maps, supporting documentation, etc.) (8 pts) _________ TOTAL (35 pts)...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/11/2012 for the course CM 426 taught by Professor Markhutchings during the Winter '12 term at BYU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online