Hume 1 - Lockes Consent Theory 1. Historical Consent state...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Locke’s Consent Theory 1. Historical Consent state is legitimate iff it originally arose by consent 2. Hypothetical Consent state is legitimate iff it would be rational for free, equal persons to consent to it 3. Actual Consent individual is obligated to obey state iff (a) state is legitimate (b) individual has consented (c) individual is within state’s jurisdiction
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Hume’s Critique of Historical Consent Fact: most states arose by violence, not consent What follows, given historical consent theory? What follows, given actual consent theory? Why does Hume think these implications are absurd? Fact: usually impossible to get the consent of all we need better ways to found states Locke’s best response: reject Historical consent theory, which contradicts Hypothetical consent
Background image of page 2
Hume’s Critique of Actual Consent Theory “Can we seriously say, that a poor peasant or artizan has a free choice to leave his country, when he knows no foreign language or manners, and lives from day to day, by the
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/15/2012 for the course PHIL 359 taught by Professor Anderson during the Fall '09 term at University of Michigan.

Page1 / 9

Hume 1 - Lockes Consent Theory 1. Historical Consent state...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online