Religion 2 - 1st Amendment & Religious Accommodation...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 st “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . . .” Q: what is a constitutionally suspect burdening of free exercise of religion? 2 possibilities: 1. Purpose law intended to make exercise more costly, impossible 2. Effect law in fact makes exercise more costly, impossible
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Revolution in our Free Exercise Rights Absolute right to freedom of relig. belief remains As to Relig. required/forbidden conduct: From Sherbert test (Brennan): purpose or effect: a) Law w/ purpose or effect of burdening observance of relig. invalid unless b) Justified by compelling state purpose: public health, safety, order or c) Within state administrative discretion: military, prisons, public lands
Background image of page 2
To Smith test (Scalia): Purpose only a) Neutral (“religion-blind”) laws presumed constitutional, regardless of burdens on relig. unless b) Covert discriminatory purpose shown e.g. slaughter laws tailored to relig.
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/15/2012 for the course PHIL 359 taught by Professor Anderson during the Fall '09 term at University of Michigan.

Page1 / 8

Religion 2 - 1st Amendment & Religious Accommodation...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online