Reciprocity & Risk

Resource sharing to reduce risk are clear 1 harvest

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ecological conditions favoring resource-sharing to reduce risk are clear: 1) harvest is relatively unsynchronized between individuals or households (so that for any given harvest some get a lot and others little); 2) food comes in large packages (resulting in diminishing marginal value to individual consumer) Evidence from several hunter-gatherer societies agrees with this argument: food most often shared when harvest is unsynchronized, and when it comes in large packages (e.g., big game); much less emphasis on sharing plant foods, small game, etc. A particularly detailed test of risk-reduction model conducted by Kaplan & Hill with Ach (hunter-gatherers in Paraguay forest) [Ach ha ing g aph] Indians Ach practice considerable variation in amount of sharing: share game resources very widely, nearly as much for honey, and less so with plant foods K&H found that variation btwn resources in amount of sharing correlated quite well with the 2 features the risk-reduction model predicted: package size (the bigger, the more diminishing returns), and daily variation in harvest synchrony between families (greater variation = less synchrony) Analogous findings apply to subsistence agriculturalists, but he...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online