This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: explained more thoroughly. With the Miss Ivors paragraph it is much more clear the power structure. I thought your Torvald Helmer argument was interesting and it added to the paragraph. You introduce that it is Norris argument well but I thought your analysis after it did not properly give enough of your voice to interpret or extrapolate what Norris was trying to say. You give more textual evidence with patting his tie reassuringly but I thought the actual Norris quotes could have gotten more of your analysis since you used more than one quote. I thought the first quote you use was used pretty smoothly but I think you need to include something along the lines that it was Riquelme who thought such and such. Also with the following quote from Riquelme, it is a pretty straight forward quote so there doesnt need to be much straddling it but I still think you have to present it with Riquelme first....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/16/2012 for the course ENGLISH 124 taught by Professor Peck during the Fall '10 term at University of Michigan.
- Fall '10