This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: even without a report of land. After that you talk about the structure of the first line giving a negative tone, that could also be some technique mentioned in the first paragraph. You mention the social aspect of the poem, but you include that here and there in the poem. Maybe that could be used in the conclusion paragraph as a macrocosm and so that gives more insight on the topic instead of just repeating the same thesis over again. Another thing is that you use a lot of superlatives to describe dickinsons poem which is fine, but the point of the paper isnt a critique of the poem itself so even though its fine im not sure its necessary to use words like masterpiece, that seems more like something that critics write in the front flap of a novel. The organization in general is pretty good, the structure of each body paragraph was concise. In general the paper is real good though, I was just trying to find things wrong with it, but there wasnt much, at least to me....
View Full Document
- Fall '10