agedeval - AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION PROGRAM EVALUATION SCHOOL: _________________________________________ DATE:_____________________ INSTRUCTOR(S): _____________________________________________________________ EVALUATOR(S): ______________________________________________________________ This program evaluation instrument was developed to assist in evaluating the instructional processes of Agricultural Science and Technology programs. It is designed for use by both the local teacher in conducting a comprehensive self-evaluation and by an external evaluation team. Indicator Ratings: 1 = Poor (major improvement needed); 2 = Below Standard; 3 = Meets Minimum Standard; 4 = Above Minimum Standard; 5 = Outstanding. Instructional Planning and Organization SUGGESTED TO WHAT EXTENT: ACTIVITIES RATING 1. Does the instructional planning and organization provide adequate opportunity for occupational experience for each student to develop the necessary skills and competencies for employment? Comments: Review the annual instructional plan 1 2 3 4 5 2. Is instruction directed toward appropriate and clearly formulated objectives with input from partnerships such as community, business, industry, and local administration? Comments: Discuss methods used to direct instruction toward objectives using input from community, business and industry, and local administration 1 2 3 4 5 3. Does the instructional program encourage the elimination of bias and stereotyping? Comments: Review instructional content for instruction that encourages the elimination of bias and stereotyping. Review program brochures. 1 2 3 4 5 4. Is a strategic plan in place that is revised annually and that provides strategies to address curriculum/technology updates, instructional materials, professional development, facility renovation, advisory committee utilization, and student chapter development (FFA)? Comments: Review Strategic Plan. 1 2 3 4 5
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
5. Is an annual plan of instruction maintained with specified goals and objectives? Comments: Review annual plan. 1 2 3 4 5 6. Is a well defined grading system in use, and was a copy given to each student? Does it include a grade for SAE? Comments: Review Grading System 1 2 3 4 5 7. Does the instructor have access to individual student files containing the assessment of student’s interests, abilities, and special needs, and is the information used appropriately to direct effective student learning? Comments: Review student assessment files. 1 2 3 4 5 8. Is there evidence of integrating and/or teaching basic skills through appropriate partnerships (career awareness, applied academics, etc.)? Comments:
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/16/2012 for the course AGSD 420 taught by Professor Kylemcgregor during the Spring '11 term at Tarleton.

Page1 / 13

agedeval - AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online