DoWeHavetheEnergyfortheNextTransition - Do We Have the...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Do We Have the Energy for the Next Transition? -- Kerr 329 (5993): 780 -- Science[10/6/2010 1:43:20 PM] Heated, but how? Fossil fuels have many innate advantages over renewable energy sources. CREDIT: CORBIS [Larger version of this image] Home > Science Magazine > 13 August 2010 > Kerr, pp. 780 - 781 Article Views Summary Full Text (HTML) Full Text (PDF) Podcast Interview Article Tools Save to My Folders Download Citation Alert Me When Article is Cited Post to CiteULike E-mail This Page Submit an E-Letter Read E-Letters Commercial Reprints and Permissions View PubMed Citation Related Content In Science Magazine Science Introduction to special issue by Malakoff et al. More Information on Related Content Similar Articles In: Science Magazine PubMed Search Google Scholar for: Articles by Kerr, R. A. Search PubMed for: Articles by Kerr, R. A. Find Citing Articles in: CrossRef Scopus My Science Science 13 August 2010: Vol. 329. no. 5993, pp. 780 - 781 DOI: 10.1126/science.329.5993.780 Prev | Table of Contents | Next NEWS NEWS: Do We Have the Energy for the Next Transition? Richard A. Kerr Past energy transitions to inherently attractive fossil fuels took half a century; moving the world to cleaner fuels could be harder and slower. Wind turbines dot ridges, distillers turn farmers' corn into ethanol by the billions of liters, and solar panels sprout on roofs. The energy revolution that will bring us clean, secure energy is under way, sort of. Never has the world so self-consciously tried to move toward new sources of energy. But the history of past major energy transitions— from wood to coal, and from coal to oil and gas—suggests that it will be a long, tough road to scaling up alternatives to fossil fuels that don't stoke greenhouse warming. A big problem is that, for the first time, the world is moving to tap new energy sources that are, in many ways, less useful and convenient than the currently dominant sources: fossil fuels. "Up to now, we've always gone to a better fuel," notes economist Robert Kaufmann of Boston University (BU). And oil has proved the best of the better. Compared with wood or even coal or gas, it "is a great fuel," Kaufmann says. Oil is densely packed with energy, easily transported and stored, and efficient at releasing its energy in modern engines. Renewables are another matter. Fuel sources like corn kernels or wood chips tend to be bulky. Their energy content is diffuse. Planting energy crops and building solar or wind farms is a land-hungry process, and the energy they deliver is often intermittent and hard to store. So far, "you can't run airliners or cars on photovoltaics," Kaufmann says. "We are confronted with a society built on high-quality energy,
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4

DoWeHavetheEnergyfortheNextTransition - Do We Have the...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online