This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: National Bank (the “Bank”). He claims that he was fired for refusing to destroy or alter a report to the audit committee of the bank. Several statutes exist that prohibited the acts that his supervisors had allegedly urged him to commit. The Human Resources Director at the Bank maintains that Matt was fired because he was not performing well in this job (as reflected in his performance evaluations), he was habitually late to work, and he missed several important deadlines in submitting reports to the President of the bank. If Matt commences a legal action against the Bank for firing him, will Matt be successful? Could the Bank be held liable for wrongful discharge? “Employment at Will” 4 prong test...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 01/18/2012 for the course LPP 255 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at Syracuse.
- Spring '08