{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Romanovs And Revolutio11

Romanovs And Revolutio11 - were also highly influential...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Romanovs And Revolutions There ain't no party like a revolutionary party A number of political parties had been set up, despite this being illegal. They fell into four groups: The Populists: They tried to incite the peasants into revolution. When this didn't work, some of them turned to terrorism. One group, "The People's Will", were responsible for assassinating Alexander II. The Socialist Revolutionaries (SRs): Grew out of the previous lot and split between moderates and terrorists. The latter dominated, and assassinated about 2,000 people for political reasons. The Social Democrats: Marxists. Would split into two groups in 1903, the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks. More on that later. The Liberals: The two major parties after 1905, the Octobrists (supporters of the October Manifesto) and the Constitutional Democrats (better known as the Kadets). The Anarchists, though not a political party as they opposed electoralism on principle,
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: were also highly influential, mainly in peasant quarters where they were close to the Populists, but the rising industrial sphere as well. Alexander III (1881-1894) managed to either stabilize or improve situation in many respects, both in economy (support of domestic industry, Siberian railway construction begun) and military (unification and upgrades) spheres, so by the end of his rule internal conflicts somewhat cooled down (not that his customs policy pleased everyone , but it worked). Then he died and Nicholas II came to the throne. According to his diaries, Nicholas didn't really feel up to the task. He was a bit insecure, mistook his stubborness for resolve and he had been raised to believe that the autocracy was the best method of government (having trained as a soldier, he didn't have a lot of skill or experience as a statesman, which is why he was enthusiastic about the last part)....
View Full Document

  • Fall '10
  • Nicholas II of Russia, Alexander II of Russia, Alexander III of Russia, Siberian railway construction, rule internal conflicts

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online