manning_randhie

manning_randhie - American Economic Association Health...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
American Economic Association Health Insurance and the Demand for Medical Care: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment Author(s): Willard G. Manning, Joseph P. Newhouse, Naihua Duan, Emmett B. Keeler, Arleen Leibowitz Reviewed work(s): Source: TheAmericanEconomicReview, Vol. 77, No. 3 (Jun., 1987), pp. 251-277 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1804094 . Accessed: 06/01/2012 17:30 . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected] American Economic Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Economic Review. http://www.jstor.org
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Health Insurance and the Demand for Medical Care: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment By WILLARD G. MANNING, JOSEPH P. NEWHOUSE, NAIHUA DUAN, EMMETT B. KEELER, ARLEEN LEIBOWITZ, AND M. SUSAN MARQUIS* We estimate how cost sharing, the portion of the bill the patient pays, affects the demand for medical services. The data come from a randomized experiment. A catastrophic insurance plan reduces expenditures 31 percent relative to zero out-of-pocket price. The price elasticity is approximately - 0.2. We reject the hypothesis that less favorable coverage of outpatient services increases total expenl- diture (for example, by deterring preventive care or inducing hospitalization). Over the past four decades medical care costs have grown about 4 percent per year in real terms, and the share of GNP devoted to medical care has increased from 4.4 percent in 1950 to 10.7 percent in 1985 (Daniel Waldo, Katherine Levit, and Helen Lazenby, 1986). A prominent explanation of this rapid increase has emphasized the spread of health insurance, which has generated demand for both a higher quality and an increased quan- tity of medical services (Martin Feldstein, 1971, 1977). In turn, the spread of health insurance has been linked to the exemption of employer-paid health insurance premiums from the individual income tax (Feldstein and Elizabeth Allison, 1974; Feldstein and Bernard Friedman, 1977; Mark Pauly, 1986). Thus, the increase in expenditure is often portrayed as a type of market failure in- duced by public policy, although such an argument is not universally accepted (Morris Barer, Robert Evans, and Gregory Stoddart, 1979; Robert Evans, 1984; John Goddeeris and Burton Weisbrod, 1985). No one has shown, however, that the
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/18/2012 for the course PADP 8610 taught by Professor Ferig during the Fall '11 term at UGA.

Page1 / 28

manning_randhie - American Economic Association Health...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online