This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: MATH 137, FALL 2010 Assignment #7 sample solution 1. We note, first, that if b 0 (so b 0) and a 6 = 0, then lim x axe bx 2 = and lim x  axe bx 2 = depending, respectively, on whether or not a > 0 or a < 0. [In deed, given > 0 ( =big), if  x  > /  a  then  axe bx 2  =  ax  e bx 2 > e b ( /  a  ) 2 > , and sign of the latter is determined by the sign of ax .] Hence in neither of these cases does f ( x ) = axe bx 2 even have an abso lute maximum. Of course if a 0, then it is impossible for f (2) = 1. Thus we assume a > 0 and b > 0. We note that (i) f is a product of compositions of elementary functions, hence dif ferentiable (hence continuous) on R ; and (ii) lim x f ( x ) = lim x ax e bx 2 = 0, by LHospitals rule; indeed lim x ax lim x e bx 2 = (indeterminate form) lim x f ( x ) = lim x d dx ax d dx e bx 2 = lim x a e bx 2 2 bx = 0 . By (ii) and (i), it is possible that the maximum may occur at x = 2. By (i), we have that if the maximum occurs at x = 2, then f (2) = 0. Hence, since f ( x ) = d dx axe bx 2 = ae bx 2 + axe bx 2 ( 2 bx ) = a (1 2 bx 2 ) e bx 2 we solve 0 = f (2) = a (1 2 b 2 2 ) e b 2 2 to see that 0 = 1 2 b 2 2 = 1 8 b , so it must be the case that b = 1...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 01/18/2012 for the course MATH 137 taught by Professor Speziale during the Fall '08 term at Waterloo.
 Fall '08
 SPEZIALE
 Math

Click to edit the document details