Lecture 24--Relation of E_P_Against Political Lib ctools

Lecture 24--Relation of E_P_Against Political Lib ctools -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 the Political: Against  Political Liberalism Lecture 24—Thurs, 4/7
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Lecture Outline Rawls—For PL finish up from last time Sandel—Against PL 3 debates that stem from Rawls Priority of Right Over Good Sandel’s 3 Objections 1) Bracketing Grave Moral Issues is Impossible 2) Why Not Reasonable Pluralism About Justice? 3) Public Reason is Too Restrictive Clarification 2
Background image of page 2
Applying PL to Current  Controversies 1 st  Controversy—Plural Marriage PL WOULD allow plural marriage To disallow it (because we don’t think that is a good kind of  marriage) would be to favor some religions or conceptions of the  good and not others PL WOULD NOT allow plural marriage Practical difficulties: complications of legal rights tied to marriage  being applied to groups of 3+ ppl. no appeal to controversial moral/religious views here Overlapping consensus  against  plural marriage exists  those who favor plural marriage are so small in number, that  they do not have to be considered  Rawls says an OC involves all doctrines with a *sizeable*   number of adherents 3
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Is the U.S. Politically Liberal? Think about how politicians, voters,  political organizations, etc. approach  constitutional and social issues Do they appeal to religion to support their  views? Do they suggest creating laws based on their  personal controversial moral beliefs? 4
Background image of page 4
In Favor of PL PL gives us hope as to how reasonable people  of radically different views can live together  on terms justifiable to all What do we end up with in a pluralistic  democratic society if we don’t follow PL? Culture wars over controversial social issues? Bickering over whose religion is the right one? Inability to justify our govt. to all?
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
In Favor of PL, cont. PL offers a kind of  politeness-respect for  moral and religious differences “Never discuss religion in polite company.” Discussions of moral/religious views often get nasty.   Better not to go there at all.  Let’s keep our moral and  religious views to ourselves.
Background image of page 6
Sandel: Introduction Sandel: 3 debates which Rawls’ work has  stemmed in political philosophy: 1) utilitarian theories of justice vs. rights-based  theories of justice Issue—foundation of justice: 
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 01/23/2012 for the course PHIL 160 taught by Professor Amandaroth during the Winter '11 term at University of Michigan.

Page1 / 23

Lecture 24--Relation of E_P_Against Political Lib ctools -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 8. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online