{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Conceptual Models for the Cuban Missile Crisis

Conceptual Models for the Cuban Missile Crisis -...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Conceptual Models for the Cuban Missile Crisis Three conceptual models to analyze most any foreign policy decision 1) The rational actor 2) Organizational behavior 3) Governmental politics model Each model illuminates different aspects of the key decisions made by both the US and Soviet Union during the crisis Rational Actor Model (RAM) Considers countries as unitary decision-makers and their actions as purposive, rational, and value-maximizing Applied to CMC Why SU put offensive missiles in Cuba? Berlin. Bargaining maneuver to help achieve long-desired Soviet goal of removing western influence from Berlin Why US respond with blockade? Best option without provoking military response Organizational Behavior Model Countries and governments are not unitary actors but vast conglomerates of loosely allied
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: organizations, each with a substantial life of its own Government Politics Model Foreign policy actions as resultants of the politics, bargaining, idea-sharing and power playing that goes on in the government-place missiles in cuba bc domestic pressures-withdrew because…. Kennedy allowed Khrushchev to save face by privately agree to move missiles Takeaways Many factors weigh in on foreign policy decisions FOPO can’t always be explained through rational utility calculations RAM would tell us MADD made Cold War a very safe period 2 and 3 show how close the world could have been to nuclear war FOPO is not only a decision but a process...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online