e_transcendental - A proof that e is transcendental...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: A proof that e is transcendental Jonathan L.F. King University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32611-2082, USA [email protected] Webpage http://www.math.ufl.edu/ ∼ squash/ 13 January, 2012 (at 10:25 ) Abstract: Uses calculus and divisibility to show that e is not algebraic. The file has two proofs, a short one due to Hilbert and a long one, probably of Hermite. Notation. For posint N , let ≡ N means “mod- N congruent”. Let :: N :: mean ≡ N ! ie., congruence mod N-factorial. 1 : Lemma. For k a natnum, integral J k := R ∞ x k e x d x equals J k = k ! . ♦ Proof. IByParts yields J k = k · J k- 1 . And J = 1. 2 : Corollary. For each natnum M and intpoly f : Z ∞ f ( x ) · x M e x d x :: M +1 :: f (0) · M ! . ♦ Hilbert’s proof that e is transcendental The Set-up. FTSOC, suppose e is algebraic of de- gree D ∈ Z + . We thus have an intpoly h ( x ) := B D x D + ··· + B 1 x + B , with B D 6 = 0 , such that h ( e ) = 0. And B 6 = 0, since h () has mini- mal degree. Proof of transcendentality. For a posint exponent r to be chosen later, define Φ( x ) := [ x- 1][ x- 2][ x- 3] ··· [ x- D ] , and I u ‘ := Z u ‘ x r Φ( x ) r +1 e x d x. Thus 0 = 0 · I ∞ = h ( e ) I ∞ = U ( r ) + L ( r ) where we have split each integral into an Upper part and a Lower part: U ( r ) := B I ∞ + X D K =1 B K e K I ∞ K , L ( r ) := X D K =1 B K e K I K . We have that U ( r ) r ! + L ( r ) r ! = 0 . The contradiction will come by showing that U ( r ) r ! is always a non-zero integer; then showing that r can be chosen large enough that L ( r ) r ! is less than 1. Upperbounding L ( r ) . Over all x in the com- pact interval [ .. D ] , let A be an upperbound for the abs-value of Φ( x ) and of x · Φ( x ). For each K ∈ [ 1 .. D ] , then, | I K | is bounded by A r +1 ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/26/2012 for the course MAC 3472 taught by Professor Jury during the Fall '07 term at University of Florida.

Page1 / 3

e_transcendental - A proof that e is transcendental...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online