A Comparison of Approaches to Politics

A Comparison of Approaches to Politics - A Comparison of...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
A Comparison of Approaches to Politics: Rational Choice Theory and Behaviouralism When many people hear the world politics, they immediately get uncomfortable or look for a way to change the topic. Politics is considered an uneasy topic to discuss and a topic that can easily lead to anger and arguments. Just as ordinary citizens disagree on politics, so do political analysts and political scientists. As politics can be looked at using various approaches, political analysts and scientists often choose to adhere to a singular approach to politics, basing their arguments and conclusions on information gathered through the use of their chosen approach. In this essay, I will attempt to compare and contrast two of these political approaches: rational choice theory and behaviouralism. I will first give an overview of the two theories. Then, I will elaborate on the differences, as well as similarities between the two approaches. Rational choice theory "arose as part of the behavioral revolution in American political science of the 1950s and 1960s [and] sought…to examine how individuals behaved, using empirical methods (Ward 1995, p.65). Rational choice theory analyzes politics based on a theory of costs versus benefits; it is heavily influenced by economics. Rational choice "assumes that individual behavior is motivated by self-interest, utility maximization, or, more simply put, goal fulfillment" (Petracca 1991, p.1). Rational choice theory assumes that when faced with a decision, individuals will choose the option that brings them the most benefits and the least amount of costs. It characterizes politics as a sort of market-place where individuals shop for options that allow them to maximize their benefits while minimizing their costs (Leftwich 2004, p. 7). It assumes, though, that "individuals have all the rational capacity, time, and emotional detachment necessary to choose the best course of action, no matter how complex the choice" (Ward 1995, p. 68), and that they will choose between "particular courses of action aimed at achieving desired ends under circumstances where their resources are scarce and their wants many" (Leftwich 2004, p.7). Following the rational choice theory, individuals are acting "within specific, given constraints and on the basis of the information they have about the conditions under which they are acting" (Scott 2000). According to Scott (2000), the relationship between the preferences and constraints is a technical one, best described as a "means to an end"; individuals cannot achieve everything they want (as their wants are many and resources scarce), so they must, therefore, prioritize their wants and the ways of satisfying those wants. They must also be able to foresee alternative choices, and, then, calculate the best option for them, taking into consideration all of the aforementioned aspects and factors. The ‘rational' choice, then, is for an individual to choose the option allowing for the highest level
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 4

A Comparison of Approaches to Politics - A Comparison of...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online